Ideal sidescan conditions?

Flatrock

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 31, 2015
Posts
952
Likes
9
Points
171
So I just got a new Helix with sidescan and have been playing around with it. Seems though that when I'm over a hard bottom, it is damn tough so see fish and the shadows give away the fish more than the actual fish. For guys that have used sidescan a lot, what would you say are the best and also worst types of structure to actually see the fish? I would think a big mudflat would be the best to see fish and a rocky, steep break would be the toughest???? I would assume fish show up nicely on shallow sandbars on the river?
 


Fisherman25

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
1,351
Likes
4
Points
196
Location
Sawyer,
Sand or mud is by far the easiest. Rocks can be tough, especially when they're also on a break line. Honestly though it just takes a lot of time time getting use to them. Shadows do help identify the difference in fish and rocks.
 

buckhunter24_7

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
1,338
Likes
130
Points
258
Shadows are what you want to look for when trying to see fish. I got a few videos from the technological angler that where good. Cheep expense for what all other fishing gear cost, just to learn how to use stuff correctly
 

RustyTackleBox

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Posts
1,782
Likes
20
Points
211
Location
Max
sidescan does not work well under 8fow from what i have seen... it is best suited in that 10-25 fow range
 

Captain Ahab

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
10,530
Likes
445
Points
428
Location
Timbuktu
sidescan does not work well under 8fow from what i have seen... it is best suited in that 10-25 fow range

I tend to disagree with this. I have used it in smaller creeks by hugging one side and scanning off to the other in as shallow as 3-4 feet and were able to see big pike and packs of suckers quite well.
 


NM 24

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Posts
223
Likes
1
Points
130
I believe the Humminbird higher frequency side imaging shows substantially less than 180 degrees vertical coverage as compared to the lower frequency, the lower frequency may be better for shallow water coverage especially closer to the boat... At least for the older Humminbird units anyway, don't know about other brands. Youtube Video:
[h=1]Tips 'N Tricks 124: Super Tuning Side Imaging Made Easy[/h]
 
Last edited:

Sum1

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Posts
4,814
Likes
289
Points
313
Location
Bismarck
Screen size can be a big factor. Subtle images are a lot easier to pick out on a 12" screen vs a 5".
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 135
  • This month: 126
  • This month: 120
  • This month: 109
  • This month: 108
  • This month: 88
  • This month: 87
  • This month: 85
  • This month: 75
  • This month: 72
Top Bottom