What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
Vehicle Discussion
Gm 6.2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rapala_09" data-source="post: 372878" data-attributes="member: 5376"><p>I have the 5.3 in a 2013 tahoe and the 6.2 in a 2019 yukon. The 6.2 is leaps and bounds ahead of the 5.3 as far as power. Neither vehicle ever tows anything heavier than a boat, but even just driving it's evident. They also have vastly different transmissions in my case, so that could be deceiving? Idk.</p><p></p><p>I have not really had problems with either. 78k on the 6.2 and have replaced some oil cooler hoses and the oil pan gasket. The 5.3 has 190k on it and have replaced a water pump and rear main seal. Both great engines and both drive down the road fine, the 6.2 just does it easier it seems. Fuel mileage is actually better in the 6.2 as well. roughly 15-16 for the 5.3 and probably around 17-18 in the 6.2.</p><p></p><p>Just my experience.</p><p></p><p>-Edit- you should note, that the 5.3 vortec in the 2013 models would be different than the 5.3 ecotec in the 2018 models I believe. I am not sure if there's a big performance difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rapala_09, post: 372878, member: 5376"] I have the 5.3 in a 2013 tahoe and the 6.2 in a 2019 yukon. The 6.2 is leaps and bounds ahead of the 5.3 as far as power. Neither vehicle ever tows anything heavier than a boat, but even just driving it's evident. They also have vastly different transmissions in my case, so that could be deceiving? Idk. I have not really had problems with either. 78k on the 6.2 and have replaced some oil cooler hoses and the oil pan gasket. The 5.3 has 190k on it and have replaced a water pump and rear main seal. Both great engines and both drive down the road fine, the 6.2 just does it easier it seems. Fuel mileage is actually better in the 6.2 as well. roughly 15-16 for the 5.3 and probably around 17-18 in the 6.2. Just my experience. -Edit- you should note, that the 5.3 vortec in the 2013 models would be different than the 5.3 ecotec in the 2018 models I believe. I am not sure if there's a big performance difference. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
7
Tailrace trout
Latest: 77Talladega
56 minutes ago
Wild Turkey
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 11:21 PM
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
R
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 10:33 PM
No Mow May
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:29 PM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Yesterday at 8:31 PM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
N
Smoke Bombs for pest control
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 6:03 PM
Representative Dockter
Latest: BDub
Yesterday at 5:50 PM
F
Western Dakota Honor Flight
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 4:46 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 2:04 PM
S
Tow Truck Driver Sentenced
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 10:09 AM
P
Tammy Miller
Latest: Pheasant 54
Yesterday at 10:07 AM
RR
Red River 5-8-24
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 8:27 AM
7
Rain
Latest: 701FishSlayer
Tuesday at 1:37 PM
Big Muddy
Latest: Obi-Wan
Tuesday at 11:18 AM
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: guywhofishes
Tuesday at 9:27 AM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Allen
Tuesday at 1:15 AM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Achucker
Monday at 10:24 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
Vehicle Discussion
Gm 6.2
Top
Bottom