What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Interesting discussion on CWD...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="( deleted account )" data-source="post: 226497" data-attributes="member: 5993"><p>Like HIV and many other “new” or at least newly discovered other diseases, the origins and spread are worked out pretty well by the epididimology people. I’m sure they could be wrong on some of the zigs and zags of its transmission. </p><p> Like in ND. As little or nothing was known of CWD 20-30-50 years ago no one was concerned about it. Now with their surveillance monitoring they are finding a bit of it. Was it always here you are asking, Guy? I dunno and am not sure anyone knows, positive or negative. But I’m sure there is a lot of truth in by looking more for it we’ll find more. But that’s all to the good, the more that is known the better intelligent rational decisions can be made to contain it, treat it or eradicate it. That’s how disease Science works I guess.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>I’m not going to hang up my guns or bows because of concern about CWD in healthy appearing animals. However, i admit that I’m always a bit relieved when I read that my harvested deer from a surveilled zone was tested negative. Many of my hunting buddies agree. </p><p>I’d like to suggest a totally voluntary program where a hunter outside a surveilled zone could have his deer jaw lymph nodes tested for a cost, 5 or 10 bucks, (I have no idea the real cost, just a made up number) and the G&F OR a private company could work with a private lab , test your deer, then let the hunter know. Would it be worth it when you know that maybe 99% of deer will be neg? I dunno. Strictly voluntary and the hunter would pay the cost for the assurance his/her deer is fine. Might be a part time business for some entrepreneur. A money maker in the future. I’m too old to start something like this but it could be a very viable business. Farm the samples out to private labs to begin with, then if it took off, build your own lab and WOW! Figure the millions of deer harvested countrywide and people wanting reassurance......</p><p>Also, data from this could help researchers and G&F.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="( deleted account ), post: 226497, member: 5993"] Like HIV and many other “new” or at least newly discovered other diseases, the origins and spread are worked out pretty well by the epididimology people. I’m sure they could be wrong on some of the zigs and zags of its transmission. Like in ND. As little or nothing was known of CWD 20-30-50 years ago no one was concerned about it. Now with their surveillance monitoring they are finding a bit of it. Was it always here you are asking, Guy? I dunno and am not sure anyone knows, positive or negative. But I’m sure there is a lot of truth in by looking more for it we’ll find more. But that’s all to the good, the more that is known the better intelligent rational decisions can be made to contain it, treat it or eradicate it. That’s how disease Science works I guess. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I’m not going to hang up my guns or bows because of concern about CWD in healthy appearing animals. However, i admit that I’m always a bit relieved when I read that my harvested deer from a surveilled zone was tested negative. Many of my hunting buddies agree. I’d like to suggest a totally voluntary program where a hunter outside a surveilled zone could have his deer jaw lymph nodes tested for a cost, 5 or 10 bucks, (I have no idea the real cost, just a made up number) and the G&F OR a private company could work with a private lab , test your deer, then let the hunter know. Would it be worth it when you know that maybe 99% of deer will be neg? I dunno. Strictly voluntary and the hunter would pay the cost for the assurance his/her deer is fine. Might be a part time business for some entrepreneur. A money maker in the future. I’m too old to start something like this but it could be a very viable business. Farm the samples out to private labs to begin with, then if it took off, build your own lab and WOW! Figure the millions of deer harvested countrywide and people wanting reassurance...... Also, data from this could help researchers and G&F. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
Today at 12:29 AM
F
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 10:24 PM
Israel
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:57 PM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 8:28 PM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Yesterday at 12:57 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 12:01 AM
F
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: Fester
Friday at 8:41 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:27 PM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Friday at 11:15 AM
8
Spring snows 24
Latest: 870XPRS
Thursday at 10:14 PM
R
Tract Optics
Latest: rodcontrol
Thursday at 2:22 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 8:59 PM
Prairie ghost
Latest: johnr
Wednesday at 4:20 PM
S
Mega Live
Latest: SLE
Wednesday at 2:12 PM
G
A good movie
Latest: gillraker
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 10:16 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
Interesting discussion on CWD...
Top
Bottom