What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB 2315 - Database Study Comm Mtg 8/26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="njsimonson" data-source="post: 267431" data-attributes="member: 1507"><p>There were 912 criminal trespass charges in ND in 2018. SOURCE: <a href="https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/sites/ag/files/documents/2018-CrimeReport.pdf" target="_blank">https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/sites/ag/files/documents/2018-CrimeReport.pdf</a>. Of those, 720 occurred within the city limits of Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks and Minot and were handled by their police departments. A good chunk of the remaining 192 were handled by police departments in smaller towns, meaning that criminal trespass, in and of itself, is a predominantly urban/in-town problem in North Dakota, and, since no one can hunt in city limits, is an act predominantly <strong>committed by <u>NON-HUNTERS</u></strong> in the state. </p><p> </p><p>Criminal trespass cited by G&F in 2018 was a mere <u><strong>27 OCCURRENCES</strong></u>. Hunting on posted land without permission was just 54 violations. Source: <a href="https://gf.nd.gov/news/2983" target="_blank">https://gf.nd.gov/news/2983</a> (I don't know where the number 65 comes from). </p><p></p><p>From second-hand reports in my conversations this week with those in attendance, there were good call-outs by the sportsmen's representatives regarding loosening the strings on access, including the creation of WMAs, WPAs and other public lands which are tied up with special interest groups having veto power on that particular land transfer group in NDCC Ch. 10-6 for any parcel that comes before them - as this committee isn't just about "the database" it's also about "access" in this state and should be studying that as well.</p><p></p><p>On that topic, it should be difficult for the special interests to scream "property rights" when referencing 2315, this committee and whatever might come after it when 1) requiring people to post their land as "open" or enter it in a database restricts the right of property owners equally, just on the opposite side of the coin, and 2) that somehow a magic government/special interest board gets the power to limit the free transfer of land in a capitalist society where dollars (and other interests, such as leaving a legacy, opening hunting, etc.) drive the free market. This was also brought up by sportsman's reps at the first meeting. </p><p></p><p>What will really need to happen in 2021 is the removal of the special interest groups from this section of the code: <a href="https://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t10c06-1.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t10c06-1.pdf</a>, which places unreasonable review restrictions on the creation of public lands through NGO-transfer to the G&F. It'll be interesting to see if the primarily-Republican legislature will get behind free-market economies and amend this highly-restrictive code, by removing private groups having influence over private individuals' decisions, which ultimately hurts those landowners looking to transfer lands for reasons other than money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="njsimonson, post: 267431, member: 1507"] There were 912 criminal trespass charges in ND in 2018. SOURCE: [URL]https://attorneygeneral.nd.gov/sites/ag/files/documents/2018-CrimeReport.pdf[/URL]. Of those, 720 occurred within the city limits of Bismarck, Fargo, Grand Forks and Minot and were handled by their police departments. A good chunk of the remaining 192 were handled by police departments in smaller towns, meaning that criminal trespass, in and of itself, is a predominantly urban/in-town problem in North Dakota, and, since no one can hunt in city limits, is an act predominantly [B]committed by [U]NON-HUNTERS[/U][/B] in the state. Criminal trespass cited by G&F in 2018 was a mere [U][B]27 OCCURRENCES[/B][/U]. Hunting on posted land without permission was just 54 violations. Source: [URL]https://gf.nd.gov/news/2983[/URL] (I don't know where the number 65 comes from). From second-hand reports in my conversations this week with those in attendance, there were good call-outs by the sportsmen's representatives regarding loosening the strings on access, including the creation of WMAs, WPAs and other public lands which are tied up with special interest groups having veto power on that particular land transfer group in NDCC Ch. 10-6 for any parcel that comes before them - as this committee isn't just about "the database" it's also about "access" in this state and should be studying that as well. On that topic, it should be difficult for the special interests to scream "property rights" when referencing 2315, this committee and whatever might come after it when 1) requiring people to post their land as "open" or enter it in a database restricts the right of property owners equally, just on the opposite side of the coin, and 2) that somehow a magic government/special interest board gets the power to limit the free transfer of land in a capitalist society where dollars (and other interests, such as leaving a legacy, opening hunting, etc.) drive the free market. This was also brought up by sportsman's reps at the first meeting. What will really need to happen in 2021 is the removal of the special interest groups from this section of the code: [URL]https://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/t10c06-1.pdf[/URL], which places unreasonable review restrictions on the creation of public lands through NGO-transfer to the G&F. It'll be interesting to see if the primarily-Republican legislature will get behind free-market economies and amend this highly-restrictive code, by removing private groups having influence over private individuals' decisions, which ultimately hurts those landowners looking to transfer lands for reasons other than money. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: Maddog
15 minutes ago
P
Columbia/NYPD
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Today at 12:43 AM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: CatDaddy
Today at 12:29 AM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:26 PM
Walleye Replica
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 6:27 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Trip McNeely
Yesterday at 6:15 PM
Check your bags boys
Latest: DirtyMike
Yesterday at 3:19 PM
Mega Live
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 11:30 AM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: Captain Ahab
Monday at 8:50 PM
A good movie
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 8:37 PM
S
Israel
Latest: snow2
Monday at 7:36 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Monday at 4:33 PM
Drotto adjustment?
Latest: guywhofishes
Sunday at 6:56 PM
SOLD
Towtector Class 4 Duramax Wing
Latest: Gr8tz
Sunday at 5:04 PM
More CWD NE ND
Latest: Average_NDA_Member
Sunday at 9:59 AM
I Love This Bar (NDA)
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 8:58 PM
Coffee and sweet beaver
Latest: Maddog
Saturday at 10:59 AM
Presidents who added the most
Latest: grumster
Saturday at 12:01 AM
Tractors
Latest: Davey Crockett
Friday at 11:15 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
SB 2315 - Database Study Comm Mtg 8/26
Top
Bottom