What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
2016 Lake Sakakawea Land Transfer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 87011" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>Ummmm I think I asked you how much is enough first.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> Feel the Bern on those damned 1%ers...........</p><p></p><p>If you would, go back and actually answer those questions I posed. </p><p></p><p>Is 65% not enough?</p><p></p><p>Because that is what is "public" land in Idaho and yet people/orgs are complaining because they have sold any amount so apparently 65% is not "enough". </p><p></p><p>Some of these groups will notbe happy or quit until entire states </p><p></p><p>Some states have shown they could manage these lands just fine Some do not want to, no state should be forced to either way. </p><p></p><p>Heres the deal, if these NGOs had not pushed to end these multiple use agreements that you and many others support, this would not be an issue. (outside of the Federal govt inability to manage ANYTHING efficiently and effectively.) </p><p></p><p>But they have and people have sat back and allowed it to happen. This quote of Tim's is spot on, this President has done more to tear apart cooperative agreements and force agendas pushed by these environmental groups more than any other. </p><p></p><p><em>"Basically the public has been ignorned, the facts have been ignored and the master manual is being ignored. <strong>You can bet your last dollar this presidency wants to make a splash and given the regime's history they don't give a damn what the people have to say."</strong></em></p><p> </p><p></p><p>So how do you get those multiple use agreements put back in place? How do you return 52 ranchers to the lands in one Nevada county they were pushed off of?</p><p></p><p>How do you regain control over agencies like the Corp and the BLM and EPA ect.....</p><p></p><p>It was shown in the first post in this thread how the Corp really doesn't listen to anyone that is elected and accountable to "we the people". </p><p></p><p>Anyways, no need to derail this thread outside of it's intended subject, there are a couple other threads if you care to continue this courteous dialogue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 87011, member: 373"] Ummmm I think I asked you how much is enough first.:) Feel the Bern on those damned 1%ers........... If you would, go back and actually answer those questions I posed. Is 65% not enough? Because that is what is "public" land in Idaho and yet people/orgs are complaining because they have sold any amount so apparently 65% is not "enough". Some of these groups will notbe happy or quit until entire states Some states have shown they could manage these lands just fine Some do not want to, no state should be forced to either way. Heres the deal, if these NGOs had not pushed to end these multiple use agreements that you and many others support, this would not be an issue. (outside of the Federal govt inability to manage ANYTHING efficiently and effectively.) But they have and people have sat back and allowed it to happen. This quote of Tim's is spot on, this President has done more to tear apart cooperative agreements and force agendas pushed by these environmental groups more than any other. [I]"Basically the public has been ignorned, the facts have been ignored and the master manual is being ignored. [B]You can bet your last dollar this presidency wants to make a splash and given the regime's history they don't give a damn what the people have to say."[/B][/I] So how do you get those multiple use agreements put back in place? How do you return 52 ranchers to the lands in one Nevada county they were pushed off of? How do you regain control over agencies like the Corp and the BLM and EPA ect..... It was shown in the first post in this thread how the Corp really doesn't listen to anyone that is elected and accountable to "we the people". Anyways, no need to derail this thread outside of it's intended subject, there are a couple other threads if you care to continue this courteous dialogue. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Food porn
Latest: Maddog
Today at 2:58 AM
Poor Sportsmanship
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 1:11 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 12:32 AM
Sporting Clays
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 8:57 PM
New MN crappie Record
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 6:19 PM
Fishing videos
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 5:08 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 1:42 PM
Colorado Elk - Rifle
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 12:35 PM
Insanity in Oregon
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:47 AM
If You Can't Sleep YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:12 PM
Elon's Damascus 1911 YT
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 9:49 PM
YOUTH TAG
Latest: Coyote Hunter
Friday at 9:14 PM
Battery draw…boat question
Latest: 1lessdog
Friday at 8:14 PM
Creek Chubs
Latest: Rowdie
Friday at 3:52 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Bullsnake
Friday at 3:30 PM
L
Dont Forget
Latest: LBrandt
Friday at 12:23 PM
Eating Nelson Lake Fish
Latest: Allen
Friday at 11:29 AM
A win for Sportsmen
Latest: 1bigfokker
Friday at 10:00 AM
Greyboe Rifle Stocks
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:14 PM
The Outfitters North Minot (WOW)
Latest: Duckslayer100
Thursday at 1:59 PM
Li time lithium batteries
Latest: Allen Gamble
Thursday at 11:03 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
2016 Lake Sakakawea Land Transfer
Top
Bottom