What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
ATF Backdoor Gun Registry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SDMF" data-source="post: 481858" data-attributes="member: 412"><p>Much of whether that would hold to be true or not has to do with an individual judge’s legal philosophy. You see both directions some are “letter of the law”, some are “activist”. </p><p></p><p>If each Red Flag event were adjudged by a 5-7 judge panel with jail (1st and mandatory) and fines (after you’re released from jail) given to defendants and their Atty if the “Red Flagging” is found to be frivolous. Maybe I could get on board. There must be VERY stiff penalties for unwarranted and/or frivolous “flagging”.</p><p></p><p>GCA ‘68 ended the ability to mail order guns and required the completion and retention of 4473 forms. GCA ‘86 defacto banned full-auto by disallowing the general public from owning any full-auto produced after 1986. Clinton ended the import of “military arms” guns and ammo from a bunch of countries, we couldn’t even bring back our own arms we’d lent, sold, or given to other countries and sell them back to taxpayers through the CMP even though arms of the same make/model were or had been recently available through CMP and were also available as new production from any gun shop in the US. M1A 308’s stick in my mind as one of the contended makes/models we weren’t able to re-import from somewhere in Europe in the late 90’s. Spain or Portugal maybe? Someone will probably remember the details better than I.</p><p></p><p>If it were just my decision, long-term in-patient mental health facilities would be my 1st step.</p><p></p><p>Qualified immunity from civil suits for “Good Samaritans” would be my 2nd. No reason it should cost a person as much as a new house in legal fees to save people in grave danger.</p><p></p><p>Teach a more comprehensive section of civics classes which make it clear to students, in a Representative Republic, The Gov’t is responsible to keep citizens safe from dangers OUTSIDE our boarders. A citizen is responsible for their own safety inside our borders.</p><p></p><p>See how those 3 changes work and GO SLOW if more change is needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SDMF, post: 481858, member: 412"] Much of whether that would hold to be true or not has to do with an individual judge’s legal philosophy. You see both directions some are “letter of the law”, some are “activist”. If each Red Flag event were adjudged by a 5-7 judge panel with jail (1st and mandatory) and fines (after you’re released from jail) given to defendants and their Atty if the “Red Flagging” is found to be frivolous. Maybe I could get on board. There must be VERY stiff penalties for unwarranted and/or frivolous “flagging”. GCA ‘68 ended the ability to mail order guns and required the completion and retention of 4473 forms. GCA ‘86 defacto banned full-auto by disallowing the general public from owning any full-auto produced after 1986. Clinton ended the import of “military arms” guns and ammo from a bunch of countries, we couldn’t even bring back our own arms we’d lent, sold, or given to other countries and sell them back to taxpayers through the CMP even though arms of the same make/model were or had been recently available through CMP and were also available as new production from any gun shop in the US. M1A 308’s stick in my mind as one of the contended makes/models we weren’t able to re-import from somewhere in Europe in the late 90’s. Spain or Portugal maybe? Someone will probably remember the details better than I. If it were just my decision, long-term in-patient mental health facilities would be my 1st step. Qualified immunity from civil suits for “Good Samaritans” would be my 2nd. No reason it should cost a person as much as a new house in legal fees to save people in grave danger. Teach a more comprehensive section of civics classes which make it clear to students, in a Representative Republic, The Gov’t is responsible to keep citizens safe from dangers OUTSIDE our boarders. A citizen is responsible for their own safety inside our borders. See how those 3 changes work and GO SLOW if more change is needed. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Jiffy
15 minutes ago
Terry Steinwand Arrested GSI
Latest: Jiffy
21 minutes ago
I Like Cheese
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 11:22 PM
M70 YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:10 PM
X
Newtown Marina 2026
Latest: xFishSlayerx
Yesterday at 6:37 PM
Big 3 results
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 6:33 PM
G
NWT
Latest: Griz
Yesterday at 5:28 PM
Bear in Fargo
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 1:00 PM
Boat Ramp Play-by-Play
Latest: Rowdie
Thursday at 6:02 PM
T
Clearwater Lakers 2019
Latest: Tikka280ai
Thursday at 11:39 AM
Food porn
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 1:59 AM
Gun Restrictions Proposal
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:10 PM
Is this lure legal?
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:37 PM
`/*%$ taxes
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 4:16 PM
P
Masters
Latest: pointer
Tuesday at 5:41 PM
Costa Rica Trout?! YT
Latest: sdwxman
Tuesday at 2:12 PM
Mozambique Rock/Surf
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Tuesday at 11:20 AM
T
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Traxion
Tuesday at 10:29 AM
Walleye length limits on big 3
Latest: johnr
Tuesday at 9:08 AM
Twins
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Tuesday at 6:35 AM
31st Annual NDSFC Banquet
Latest: Honkerherms
Monday at 9:01 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
ATF Backdoor Gun Registry
Top
Bottom