What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Car insurance and STD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="undguy" data-source="post: 344772" data-attributes="member: 1315"><p>This guy gets it. The insured paid for a policy. The arbitrator and the court determined that the policy covered this situation. GEICO refused to defend the lawsuit even though they had a contractual obligation to do so. Therefore they are on the hook. It’s not legal mumbo jumbo. It’s a simple contract. I pay for insurance in exchange for the insurance company defending me if I get sued. </p><p></p><p>Some of you are saying the case should have been thrown out immediately. The case wasn’t at that stage yet. If GEICO would had done what their policy said they should, they would have stepped up and said “ we are defending our insured.” They then file a motion for summary judgment which argues that the claim is bs. Chances are at that point the court grants the motion and it’s case closed. Instead GEICO refused to do what they were being paid premiums for. </p><p></p><p>Whether an insurance policy SHOULD cover this is a whole different discussion. Personally I don’t think so but I didn’t get a vote.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="undguy, post: 344772, member: 1315"] This guy gets it. The insured paid for a policy. The arbitrator and the court determined that the policy covered this situation. GEICO refused to defend the lawsuit even though they had a contractual obligation to do so. Therefore they are on the hook. It’s not legal mumbo jumbo. It’s a simple contract. I pay for insurance in exchange for the insurance company defending me if I get sued. Some of you are saying the case should have been thrown out immediately. The case wasn’t at that stage yet. If GEICO would had done what their policy said they should, they would have stepped up and said “ we are defending our insured.” They then file a motion for summary judgment which argues that the claim is bs. Chances are at that point the court grants the motion and it’s case closed. Instead GEICO refused to do what they were being paid premiums for. Whether an insurance policy SHOULD cover this is a whole different discussion. Personally I don’t think so but I didn’t get a vote. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
47 minutes ago
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 7:49 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 7:15 PM
Tammy Miller
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 6:49 PM
Oahe report Mobridge
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 4:34 PM
Melatonin
Latest: wslayer
Today at 11:09 AM
RR
Red River 5-5-24
Latest: Captainbrad
Today at 7:49 AM
Big Muddy
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 6:53 AM
Hemp clothing
Latest: Sum1
Yesterday at 5:53 PM
Bank runs
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 5:00 PM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Trip McNeely
Yesterday at 10:28 AM
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:56 AM
F
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: Fester
Friday at 10:55 PM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 9:33 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:18 PM
Spring
Latest: grumster
Friday at 3:11 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Friday at 10:38 AM
Rain
Latest: Maddog
Friday at 2:09 AM
You paddledoggers are quiet...
Latest: cooter00
Thursday at 5:26 PM
Ruele Lake Boat Ramp
Latest: Shockwave
Thursday at 1:34 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Car insurance and STD
Top
Bottom