What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Cormorants
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fly Carpin" data-source="post: 289938" data-attributes="member: 1187"><p>For those unwilling to read such densely worded policy, the alternatives they're looking at compared to the no action alternative are:</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">(1) Establish a new permit for State wildlife agencies for authorizing certain cormorant management and control activities that are normally prohibited and are intended to relieve or prevent impacts from cormorants on wild and stocked fisheries, aquaculture facilities, human health and safety, property, and threatened and endangered species (as listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 <em>et seq.</em>)). States would have the delegated authority to determine whether, when, where, and for what purposes to control cormorants within limits set by the Service.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">(2) Establish an aquaculture depredation order, which would allow take of cormorants under prescribed conditions at aquaculture facilities without the need to acquire an individual permit.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">(3) Both (1) and (2) in combination.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">If you've noticed a remarkable decline in the quality of a recreational fishery in the last X years, or any other adverse impact to a fishery, and you think it's due to cormorant population increase, comment on this! It's your right and duty as an American to take an active role as a stakeholder. Or just complain on Nodak and yuck it up about practicing the three S's. Either way is good with me. </span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Hot tips from the feds on how to get your comment noticed:</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">a. Be as succinct as possible.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">b. Be specific. Comments supported by logic, rationale, and citations are more useful than opinions.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">c. State suggestions and recommendations clearly with an expectation of what you would like the Service to do.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">d. If you propose an additional alternative for consideration, please provide supporting rationale and why you believe it to be a reasonable alternative that would meet the purpose and need for our proposed action.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica'">e. If you provide alternate interpretations of science, please support your analysis with appropriate citations.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fly Carpin, post: 289938, member: 1187"] For those unwilling to read such densely worded policy, the alternatives they're looking at compared to the no action alternative are: [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica](1) Establish a new permit for State wildlife agencies for authorizing certain cormorant management and control activities that are normally prohibited and are intended to relieve or prevent impacts from cormorants on wild and stocked fisheries, aquaculture facilities, human health and safety, property, and threatened and endangered species (as listed under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 [I]et seq.[/I])). States would have the delegated authority to determine whether, when, where, and for what purposes to control cormorants within limits set by the Service.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica](2) Establish an aquaculture depredation order, which would allow take of cormorants under prescribed conditions at aquaculture facilities without the need to acquire an individual permit.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica](3) Both (1) and (2) in combination. [FONT=Verdana]If you've noticed a remarkable decline in the quality of a recreational fishery in the last X years, or any other adverse impact to a fishery, and you think it's due to cormorant population increase, comment on this! It's your right and duty as an American to take an active role as a stakeholder. Or just complain on Nodak and yuck it up about practicing the three S's. Either way is good with me. Hot tips from the feds on how to get your comment noticed: [/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica]a. Be as succinct as possible.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica]b. Be specific. Comments supported by logic, rationale, and citations are more useful than opinions.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica]c. State suggestions and recommendations clearly with an expectation of what you would like the Service to do.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica]d. If you propose an additional alternative for consideration, please provide supporting rationale and why you believe it to be a reasonable alternative that would meet the purpose and need for our proposed action.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=helvetica]e. If you provide alternate interpretations of science, please support your analysis with appropriate citations.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: Kurtr
34 minutes ago
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Bed Wetter
41 minutes ago
T
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Traxion
Today at 12:52 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: SDMF
Today at 10:53 AM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Today at 9:26 AM
Newbie here.
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:00 PM
What are these things?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:27 PM
S
Heated jackets
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 6:54 PM
S
F 150 Owners
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 6:50 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Vollmer
Yesterday at 5:10 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: Colt45
Yesterday at 4:25 PM
S
Backyard chickens?
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 4:11 PM
sharpening auger blades
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 3:58 PM
L
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 1:26 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 12:45 PM
S
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: savage270
Yesterday at 12:43 PM
D
Catfish anyone?
Latest: Downrigger
Yesterday at 8:08 AM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Monday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Monday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Monday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Monday at 2:37 AM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Sunday at 1:51 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Cormorants
Top
Bottom