Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Davey Crockett" data-source="post: 360885" data-attributes="member: 367">You'd think that LEO's can charge someone with trespassing on private land without the consent from anyone but that's just a guess.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; I was online the day the video was released so I did a search on&nbsp; facebook and saw the following. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The landowner who granted permission and the hunter who had asked for permission , in a heated argument .&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; The land owner seemed very pissed off and stated 2 or 3&nbsp; times that he had been very clear about staying away from Jeff's land when he &quot;granted&quot;&nbsp; them permission.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The word granted seemed out of place because we usually say I &quot;gave&quot; you permission.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The landowner was clearly very pissed off about the whole thing and the hunter kept deleting landowners posts that he didn't want the public to see.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Then a couple days later the Sweere kid said they hunted the same field again the next day.&nbsp; t&nbsp;That's where It gets confusing.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; The way the fur was flying during the online confrontation I was surprised that they had resolved it that fast and thought they either made amends&nbsp; after they settled down or ....&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; (This is me thinking out loud)&nbsp;&nbsp; Was there a money exchange under the table for a 2 day hunt and hunters had landowner over a barrel ?&nbsp; Or Sweere told a fib and said they hunted the same field when they didn't to add credibility to his grand slam video.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Also whoever mentioned that you have to include advertisement to make money of youtube videos , I'm not sure how accurate that is ,&nbsp;&nbsp; I read several articles that said otherwise .&nbsp;&nbsp; hey hunted the same field the next day.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </blockquote>

[QUOTE="Davey Crockett, post: 360885, member: 367"] You'd think that LEO's can charge someone with trespassing on private land without the consent from anyone but that's just a guess. I was online the day the video was released so I did a search on facebook and saw the following. The landowner who granted permission and the hunter who had asked for permission , in a heated argument . The land owner seemed very pissed off and stated 2 or 3 times that he had been very clear about staying away from Jeff's land when he "granted" them permission. The word granted seemed out of place because we usually say I "gave" you permission. The landowner was clearly very pissed off about the whole thing and the hunter kept deleting landowners posts that he didn't want the public to see. Then a couple days later the Sweere kid said [B]they hunted the same field again the next day.[/B] [COLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)] t[/COLOR] That's where It gets confusing. The way the fur was flying during the online confrontation I was surprised that they had resolved it that fast and thought they either made amends after they settled down or .... (This is me thinking out loud) Was there a money exchange under the table for a 2 day hunt and hunters had landowner over a barrel ? Or Sweere told a fib and said they hunted the same field when they didn't to add credibility to his grand slam video. Also whoever mentioned that you have to include advertisement to make money of youtube videos , I'm not sure how accurate that is , I read several articles that said otherwise . [COLOR=rgb(255, 255, 255)]hey hunted the same field the next day. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA