What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Hunting land for sale $376 dollars per acre
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 148589" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>Here is another example of what the Federal govt tries to do under the Endangered Species Act. </p><p></p><p> <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/" target="_blank">http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/</a></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><img src="http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2014-04-25T111946Z_1_CBREA3O0VH200_RTROPTP_4_USA-CALIFORNIA-WATER-e1484320613248.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit">Within hours of the release of a potentially adverse federal court decision in late December, the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) extended by two months the open public comment period for consideration of its Bay-Delta Plan.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit">Elements of its plan include an uncompensated mandate to increase flows on several major California rivers by <span style="color: #ff0000">d<strong>epriving long-established water-rights holders of access to their water.</strong></span> Now a federal court says the state must pay for water it takes, establishing a precedent that might lead to billions of dollars in unanticipated costs for the state.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit">U.S. Court of Claims Judge Marilyn Blank Horn’s decision in favor of an irrigation district opens the door for water-rights holders to sue California for compensation when the state takes water for environmental purposes.</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit">The court order dealt with water from the Klamath River that the federal government held back from the suit’s plaintiff, an irrigation district that straddles the California-Oregon border. <strong><span style="color: #ff0000"> The feds took the water in 2001 in the name of protecting endangered species, including the Lost River sucker. The suit has slowly wended its way through the courts for 15 years. </span></strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit">Until Wednesday’s decision, the state has not paid compensation to those deprived of their water under various environmental laws and regulations that require transfers of water from rights holders to fish, animals, birds, habitat, recreation, Native American tribes and water-quality uses. Now an influential jurist says the state’s interpretation of its powers as so-called “regulatory takings” is incorrect.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit">Judge Blank Horn’s decision establishes a precedent that the takings of Klamath River water from California and Oregon farmers in 2001 were physical acts, not regulatory ones, making them subject to the Fifth Amendment’s unreasonable seizure clause and encumbering the government with the responsibility to pay owners for their losses when they deprive them of their property.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit">Horn noted that government officials used “physical means” to cut off the water to farms, triggering a “categorical duty” that the government compensate the holders of water rights that were infringed.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong>Since Governor Jerry Brown declared his drought emergency in January 2014, the SWRCB has acted with near impunity to take water by stripping water-rights holders of their water allocations and forcing water transfers without compensation</strong>.</span> If Blank Horn’s court decision survives appeal, the state will be responsible for the cost of all waters that they redirected, an unpaid bill potentially totaling many billions of dollars.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"><span style="font-family: inherit">Read more: <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4R0kVUk" target="_blank">http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4R0kVUk</a></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-family: inherit">Read more: <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4QvRG5N" target="_blank">http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4QvRG5N</a></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 148589, member: 373"] Here is another example of what the Federal govt tries to do under the Endangered Species Act. [URL]http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/[/URL] [COLOR=#000000][FONT='inherit'][IMG]http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2014-04-25T111946Z_1_CBREA3O0VH200_RTROPTP_4_USA-CALIFORNIA-WATER-e1484320613248.jpg[/IMG][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT='inherit'][FONT=inherit]Within hours of the release of a potentially adverse federal court decision in late December, the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) extended by two months the open public comment period for consideration of its Bay-Delta Plan.[/FONT] [FONT=inherit]Elements of its plan include an uncompensated mandate to increase flows on several major California rivers by [COLOR=#ff0000]d[B]epriving long-established water-rights holders of access to their water.[/B][/COLOR] Now a federal court says the state must pay for water it takes, establishing a precedent that might lead to billions of dollars in unanticipated costs for the state.[/FONT] [FONT=inherit]U.S. Court of Claims Judge Marilyn Blank Horn’s decision in favor of an irrigation district opens the door for water-rights holders to sue California for compensation when the state takes water for environmental purposes.[/FONT] [FONT=inherit]The court order dealt with water from the Klamath River that the federal government held back from the suit’s plaintiff, an irrigation district that straddles the California-Oregon border. [B][COLOR=#ff0000] The feds took the water in 2001 in the name of protecting endangered species, including the Lost River sucker. The suit has slowly wended its way through the courts for 15 years. [/COLOR][/B] [/FONT] Until Wednesday’s decision, the state has not paid compensation to those deprived of their water under various environmental laws and regulations that require transfers of water from rights holders to fish, animals, birds, habitat, recreation, Native American tribes and water-quality uses. Now an influential jurist says the state’s interpretation of its powers as so-called “regulatory takings” is incorrect. Judge Blank Horn’s decision establishes a precedent that the takings of Klamath River water from California and Oregon farmers in 2001 were physical acts, not regulatory ones, making them subject to the Fifth Amendment’s unreasonable seizure clause and encumbering the government with the responsibility to pay owners for their losses when they deprive them of their property. Horn noted that government officials used “physical means” to cut off the water to farms, triggering a “categorical duty” that the government compensate the holders of water rights that were infringed. [COLOR=#ff0000][B]Since Governor Jerry Brown declared his drought emergency in January 2014, the SWRCB has acted with near impunity to take water by stripping water-rights holders of their water allocations and forcing water transfers without compensation[/B].[/COLOR] If Blank Horn’s court decision survives appeal, the state will be responsible for the cost of all waters that they redirected, an unpaid bill potentially totaling many billions of dollars. [FONT=inherit] Read more: [URL]http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4R0kVUk[/URL][/FONT] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][FONT='inherit'] Read more: [URL]http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/13/court-decision-may-mean-california-owes-billions-in-water-rights/#ixzz4W4QvRG5N[/URL][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: BrokenBackJack
15 minutes ago
T
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: Traxion
24 minutes ago
N
Tailrace trout
Latest: Nmariner
55 minutes ago
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 10:41 AM
Representative Dockter
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 10:38 AM
C
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: camper
Today at 10:35 AM
No Mow May
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 9:45 AM
Wild Turkey
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 4:23 AM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Yesterday at 8:31 PM
N
Smoke Bombs for pest control
Latest: ndrivrrat
Yesterday at 6:03 PM
F
Western Dakota Honor Flight
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 4:46 PM
Any Birders here?
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 2:04 PM
S
Tow Truck Driver Sentenced
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 10:09 AM
P
Tammy Miller
Latest: Pheasant 54
Yesterday at 10:07 AM
RR
Red River 5-8-24
Latest: Captainbrad
Yesterday at 8:27 AM
7
Rain
Latest: 701FishSlayer
Tuesday at 1:37 PM
Big Muddy
Latest: Obi-Wan
Tuesday at 11:18 AM
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: guywhofishes
Tuesday at 9:27 AM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: Allen
Tuesday at 1:15 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Hunting land for sale $376 dollars per acre
Top
Bottom