What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 188691" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 188691, member: 314"] No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
29 minutes ago
Newbie here.
Latest: Vollmer
Yesterday at 11:01 PM
U
Catfish anyone?
Latest: USMCGrunt
Yesterday at 10:23 PM
Backyard chickens?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
What are these things?
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 7:29 PM
T
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 7:28 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 2:37 AM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Sunday at 6:56 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Sunday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Sunday at 9:35 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Sunday at 5:55 AM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
Top
Bottom