What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 188691" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 188691, member: 314"] No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
V
Sucker Minnows
Latest: v193
12 minutes ago
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Rut2much
46 minutes ago
Boat carpet
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 8:56 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Today at 1:39 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:37 PM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 3:48 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Yesterday at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 11:40 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Sunday at 10:41 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:57 PM
W
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: woodduck30
Sunday at 7:47 PM
L
Chuck Norris~
Latest: LBrandt
Sunday at 6:13 PM
I finally won a gun
Latest: cooter00
Sunday at 3:26 PM
Taylor Sheridan
Latest: Vollmer
Sunday at 10:05 AM
YT Divorce Eggs
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 9:15 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Saturday at 7:33 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
Top
Bottom