What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 188691" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KDM, post: 188691, member: 314"] No issues here PG. Emotion is best left OUT of a discussion. It can be touchy, immature, childish, and far fetched, but I don't bring it up to be so. For the first time in my lifetime, there was a request of the legislature to consider making every acre of private land automatically posted, it tells me there are at least a growing number of people that think it's necessary. I DON'T think its even close to being necessary and don't want a SD style of land usage. It punishes everyone for the actions of a few and that's just WRONG. I bring this up simply as food for thought. Is that game animal worth hard feelings?? I see more and more shelter belts, sloughs, CRP, and other cover being removed for croplands. Regardless of how you feel about these actions, it doesn't bode well for having MORE wildlife on the landscape meaning more hunters will be competing for what is left. Competition usually results in price tags being applied and then the fattest wallets win and that is also WRONG. Hunters and landowners are so interconnected that every issue between them affects every other issue and IMO, looking at the big picture is better than picking at the individual issues. Thank GOD these encounters with bad landowners or hunters are the exception rather than the rule and I would like to ensure it stays that way so we as hunters or landowners can disregard those ignorant pitiful few that just want to cause conflicts as poor folks that must have a terrible life. It's just that if you added the number of hunters and the number of landowners (80 acres or more) together, we would still probably be outnumbered by the urban masses that vote by what youtube, facebook, and the TV says rather than with their own minds and THAT is what has me concerned the most. If we allow ourselves (hunters/landowners) to be an issue.......I'm afraid we will all lose. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
MN Wolves
Latest: Zogman
29 minutes ago
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 6:04 AM
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Wally World
Yesterday at 11:16 PM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:58 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:23 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 8:40 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:48 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:26 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 2:19 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 1:05 PM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 7:11 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 6:27 AM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:43 PM
Wolves at J Clark Sawyer
Latest: Davy Crockett
Tuesday at 11:08 AM
W
Which one you did this?
Latest: walleyeman_1875
Monday at 12:17 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Bird Hunting
Waterfowl
Hunting 'Unposted' Private Land
Top
Bottom