Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 233632" data-attributes="member: 367"><p>From the link I posted what Canada is doing.</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Two nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have two nanograms, but less than five, you would face a summary conviction and up to a $1,000 fine.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">"With two nanograms, it's not a criminal offence, its a summary offence," Murie said. "You're not fingerprinted, so it would not show up on CPIC [Canadian Police Information Centre], it wouldn't show up on an employment check or a passport application."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">In an analysis <a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2017/2017-10-14/html/reg1-eng.html" target="_blank">statement</a> with the draft legislation, Ottawa said that this low offence is "is not directly linked to impairment, but is, rather, based on a precautionary or a crime prevention approach."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Five or more nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have five nanograms or more, it gets more serious, just like if you're caught with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over .08. It's a <a href="http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/victims-victimes/court-tribunaux/offences-infractions.html" target="_blank">hybrid offence</a> and, depending on the seriousness, you could face a fine and jail time. The maximum penalty for a criminal offence would be 10 years. This level of THC is "expected to cause some driving impairment," the statement said.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Recent Posts

F
NFL News (Vikings)
- Latest: Fester
- 7 minutes ago
The Decline of Devils Lake
- Latest: Kurtr
- 11 minutes ago
Buying gold and silver.
- Latest: Sum1
- 54 minutes ago
F
Bitcoin
- Latest: Fester
- Today at 11:43 AM
Wood Stoves
- Latest: Hamm's
- Today at 10:39 AM
T
ICE Fishing videos
- Latest: thriller1
- Today at 10:11 AM
B
Model 12 Winchester
- Latest: Bauer
- Today at 7:53 AM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
- Latest: Maddog
- Yesterday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
- Latest: wslayer
- Yesterday at 4:36 PM
T
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
- Latest: Traxion
- Yesterday at 12:52 PM
Newbie here.
- Latest: svnmag
- Tuesday at 9:00 PM
What are these things?
- Latest: svnmag
- Tuesday at 8:27 PM
S
F 150 Owners
- Latest: snow2
- Tuesday at 6:50 PM
S
Backyard chickens?
- Latest: snow2
- Tuesday at 4:11 PM
sharpening auger blades
- Latest: risingsun
- Tuesday at 3:58 PM
L
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
- Latest: LBrandt
- Tuesday at 1:26 PM
S
500,000 acre habitat program
- Latest: savage270
- Tuesday at 12:43 PM
D
Catfish anyone?
- Latest: Downrigger
- Tuesday at 8:08 AM
Seekins rifles
- Latest: Jiffy
- Monday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
- Latest: 5575
- Monday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
- Latest: Lycanthrope
- Monday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
- Latest: Allen
- Monday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
- Latest: LBrandt
- Monday at 2:37 AM

Friends of NDA

Top Bottom