What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 233632" data-attributes="member: 367"><p>From the link I posted what Canada is doing.</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Two nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have two nanograms, but less than five, you would face a summary conviction and up to a $1,000 fine.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">"With two nanograms, it's not a criminal offence, its a summary offence," Murie said. "You're not fingerprinted, so it would not show up on CPIC [Canadian Police Information Centre], it wouldn't show up on an employment check or a passport application."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">In an analysis <a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2017/2017-10-14/html/reg1-eng.html" target="_blank">statement</a> with the draft legislation, Ottawa said that this low offence is "is not directly linked to impairment, but is, rather, based on a precautionary or a crime prevention approach."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Five or more nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have five nanograms or more, it gets more serious, just like if you're caught with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over .08. It's a <a href="http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/victims-victimes/court-tribunaux/offences-infractions.html" target="_blank">hybrid offence</a> and, depending on the seriousness, you could face a fine and jail time. The maximum penalty for a criminal offence would be 10 years. This level of THC is "expected to cause some driving impairment," the statement said.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Davy Crockett, post: 233632, member: 367"] From the link I posted what Canada is doing. [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt][FONT=Pratt-Bold]Two nanograms[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#595959][FONT=Helvetica] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt]If you have two nanograms, but less than five, you would face a summary conviction and up to a $1,000 fine.[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt]"With two nanograms, it's not a criminal offence, its a summary offence," Murie said. "You're not fingerprinted, so it would not show up on CPIC [Canadian Police Information Centre], it wouldn't show up on an employment check or a passport application."[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt]In an analysis [URL="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2017/2017-10-14/html/reg1-eng.html"]statement[/URL] with the draft legislation, Ottawa said that this low offence is "is not directly linked to impairment, but is, rather, based on a precautionary or a crime prevention approach."[/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt][FONT=Pratt-Bold]Five or more nanograms[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#191919][FONT=Pratt]If you have five nanograms or more, it gets more serious, just like if you're caught with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over .08. It's a [URL="http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/victims-victimes/court-tribunaux/offences-infractions.html"]hybrid offence[/URL] and, depending on the seriousness, you could face a fine and jail time. The maximum penalty for a criminal offence would be 10 years. This level of THC is "expected to cause some driving impairment," the statement said.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
15 minutes ago
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: 1lessdog
37 minutes ago
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
43 minutes ago
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 6:20 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: risingsun
Today at 6:10 PM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: bucksnbears
Today at 5:51 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Today at 5:43 PM
POS
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 5:43 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 5:03 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Today at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Today at 10:18 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: SDMF
Today at 9:53 AM
S
Morels
Latest: snow2
Today at 9:02 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Yesterday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Yesterday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 11:15 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:39 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Monday at 1:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
Top
Bottom