Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 233632" data-attributes="member: 367"><p>From the link I posted what Canada is doing.</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Two nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #595959"><span style="font-family: 'Helvetica'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have two nanograms, but less than five, you would face a summary conviction and up to a $1,000 fine.</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">"With two nanograms, it's not a criminal offence, its a summary offence," Murie said. "You're not fingerprinted, so it would not show up on CPIC [Canadian Police Information Centre], it wouldn't show up on an employment check or a passport application."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">In an analysis <a href="http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2017/2017-10-14/html/reg1-eng.html" target="_blank">statement</a> with the draft legislation, Ottawa said that this low offence is "is not directly linked to impairment, but is, rather, based on a precautionary or a crime prevention approach."</span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt-Bold'">Five or more nanograms</span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #191919"><span style="font-family: 'Pratt'">If you have five nanograms or more, it gets more serious, just like if you're caught with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over .08. It's a <a href="http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/victims-victimes/court-tribunaux/offences-infractions.html" target="_blank">hybrid offence</a> and, depending on the seriousness, you could face a fine and jail time. The maximum penalty for a criminal offence would be 10 years. This level of THC is "expected to cause some driving impairment," the statement said.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Recent Posts

NFL News (Vikings)
- Latest: Allen
- Yesterday at 11:59 PM
ND suppressor laws update?
- Latest: luvcatchingbass
- Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Pheasant opener # 57
- Latest: svnmag
- Yesterday at 9:50 PM
C
Gasoline pump prices
- Latest: camper
- Yesterday at 8:29 PM
J
Truck Topper
- Latest: JUSTWINGNIT
- Yesterday at 5:11 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
- Latest: wslayer
- Yesterday at 4:43 PM
Teachers
- Latest: eyexer
- Yesterday at 4:12 PM
Saddle Hunting Newb
- Latest: KDM
- Yesterday at 2:18 PM
NDSU to the FBS???
- Latest: NDSportsman
- Yesterday at 8:14 AM
Keeping traditions going
- Latest: Davy Crockett
- Yesterday at 3:58 AM
Cast Iron/New Crisco
- Latest: svnmag
- Sunday at 7:57 PM
Bone in Venison Chops??
- Latest: Davy Crockett
- Sunday at 6:53 PM
Massive Flash Flood
- Latest: lunkerslayer
- Sunday at 6:01 PM
Creek Trout YT
- Latest: svnmag
- Saturday at 8:47 PM
Are the Brits are friends?
- Latest: svnmag
- Saturday at 8:11 PM
Generation X
- Latest: lunkerslayer
- Saturday at 8:06 PM
M9 Moose
- Latest: wslayer
- Saturday at 5:16 PM
What happened to DB-2
- Latest: Jiffy
- Saturday at 1:23 PM
M
M11 cow moose
- Latest: Mhall92
- Saturday at 12:49 PM
R
migration 26
- Latest: riverview
- Saturday at 9:29 AM
This is very sad and wrong
- Latest: Zogman
- Saturday at 7:00 AM

Friends of NDA

Top Bottom