What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JayKay" data-source="post: 233789" data-attributes="member: 324"><p>Sigh, I oughta know better than to re-join this argument.</p><p></p><p>No, I have not been in any marijuana shops. As a recovering alcoholic, I have no desire to visit such a place - nice and clean - or otherwise. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying "nobody should be able to go, because I don't go..". I'm just imagining me in such a place, and someone could yell "hypocrite" and I'd be like "umm, I'm doing research". </p><p></p><p>All of a sudden Bill Clinton and Jim Baker make perfect sense.</p><p></p><p>Switching gears (and most importantly), my stance remains the same. I can't see any benefit to any person - at least not any logical benefit in MY mind - to any person regarding using marijuana recreationally. I fully recognize that many people, on this site and elsewhere, WANT to use recreationally, but I don't see their desire as a reason for me to vote to change an existing law. </p><p></p><p>Between you and I and a fence-post, if it were legal, and the topic was making it illegal, I'd probably have to say I don't want changes. </p><p></p><p>In my mind, the fact that there is an opioid epidemic is no reason to make this (currently illegal) drug legal. That's like saying we need to raise the speed limits, because there aren't enough parking ramps. I get however, that you're saying we use the resources we currently use for policing pot, on a more troublesome epidemic. I get that you're thinking "with all the money we save by letting people smoke, we can go after the more dangerous drugs". </p><p></p><p>Personally, I think that that's BS. </p><p></p><p>For those who think that by letting people legally smoke pot, we are going to have LESS drugs around..? I don't buy that for a minute either. In my opinion, and experience, pot is just one of many gateway drugs. You can roll your eyes and call me dumb, but I have been around. Maybe some people smoke pot and never do anything else. Maybe some can still function and be a productive member of society yada yada yada. But a lot can't and don't. For a lot of people, smoking pot is one step in a long series of steps, leading into addiction and piss-poor decision making, loss of self, loss of family, loss of freedom.</p><p></p><p>People say pot is harmless. WAY different than those hard drugs. Nobody goes from pot to meth or coke or heroin right? All those people on those bad drugs, they all wanted to be on those bad drugs. They did that on purpose, right? You ask them when they're on the other side, in recovery (if they're still alive) and they'll tell you that they never meant to be in the gutter. They never meant to lose their family and job. Again, I'm not saying that all pot smokers end up like this. But some do.</p><p></p><p>I also want to be clear, that my rhetoric and language are not coming from some anti-pot brochure, or from listening to Bob Wefald. These are my first-hand observations.</p><p></p><p>Jaykay</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JayKay, post: 233789, member: 324"] Sigh, I oughta know better than to re-join this argument. No, I have not been in any marijuana shops. As a recovering alcoholic, I have no desire to visit such a place - nice and clean - or otherwise. I'm not saying "nobody should be able to go, because I don't go..". I'm just imagining me in such a place, and someone could yell "hypocrite" and I'd be like "umm, I'm doing research". All of a sudden Bill Clinton and Jim Baker make perfect sense. Switching gears (and most importantly), my stance remains the same. I can't see any benefit to any person - at least not any logical benefit in MY mind - to any person regarding using marijuana recreationally. I fully recognize that many people, on this site and elsewhere, WANT to use recreationally, but I don't see their desire as a reason for me to vote to change an existing law. Between you and I and a fence-post, if it were legal, and the topic was making it illegal, I'd probably have to say I don't want changes. In my mind, the fact that there is an opioid epidemic is no reason to make this (currently illegal) drug legal. That's like saying we need to raise the speed limits, because there aren't enough parking ramps. I get however, that you're saying we use the resources we currently use for policing pot, on a more troublesome epidemic. I get that you're thinking "with all the money we save by letting people smoke, we can go after the more dangerous drugs". Personally, I think that that's BS. For those who think that by letting people legally smoke pot, we are going to have LESS drugs around..? I don't buy that for a minute either. In my opinion, and experience, pot is just one of many gateway drugs. You can roll your eyes and call me dumb, but I have been around. Maybe some people smoke pot and never do anything else. Maybe some can still function and be a productive member of society yada yada yada. But a lot can't and don't. For a lot of people, smoking pot is one step in a long series of steps, leading into addiction and piss-poor decision making, loss of self, loss of family, loss of freedom. People say pot is harmless. WAY different than those hard drugs. Nobody goes from pot to meth or coke or heroin right? All those people on those bad drugs, they all wanted to be on those bad drugs. They did that on purpose, right? You ask them when they're on the other side, in recovery (if they're still alive) and they'll tell you that they never meant to be in the gutter. They never meant to lose their family and job. Again, I'm not saying that all pot smokers end up like this. But some do. I also want to be clear, that my rhetoric and language are not coming from some anti-pot brochure, or from listening to Bob Wefald. These are my first-hand observations. Jaykay [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:27 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 8:44 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:37 PM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 7:05 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 3:48 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:16 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Yesterday at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 11:40 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Sunday at 10:41 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:57 PM
W
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: woodduck30
Sunday at 7:47 PM
L
Chuck Norris~
Latest: LBrandt
Sunday at 6:13 PM
I finally won a gun
Latest: cooter00
Sunday at 3:26 PM
Taylor Sheridan
Latest: Vollmer
Sunday at 10:05 AM
YT Divorce Eggs
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 9:15 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Saturday at 7:33 PM
Standout: The Ben Kjar Story
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 2:10 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
M3, yea or nay?
Top
Bottom