What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lycanthrope" data-source="post: 480331" data-attributes="member: 562"><p>BIG NEWS FOR GUN OWNERS who use weed and other controlled substances! (which definitely isnt me)</p><p></p><p>The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regulates federal firearms prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which makes it unlawful for any person who is an "unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act) to possess, ship, transport, or receive firearms that have moved in interstate or foreign commerce. This stems from the Gun Control Act of 1968.The "old" rule refers to the 1997 ATF regulation (27 CFR § 478.11), which provided a broad interpretation allowing inferences of prohibited status based on single or isolated incidents within recent time frames. The "new" rule is an interim final rule published on January 22, 2026, in the Federal Register, effective immediately, which narrows the definition to require evidence of regular, ongoing use. This change aligns with federal court precedents emphasizing that the prohibition applies only to current, patterned behavior, not remote or sporadic use. Comments on the rule are accepted until June 30, 2026.</p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><th>Aspect</th><th>Old Rule (1997)</th><th>New Rule (2026)</th></tr><tr><td>Definition of "Unlawful User"</td><td>A current user of a controlled substance in a manner other than as prescribed by a licensed physician. Use could be inferred from recent evidence or a pattern, but allowed broad application including single incidents. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +1</td><td>A person who regularly uses a controlled substance over an extended period of time continuing into the present, without a lawful prescription or in a manner substantially different from that prescribed by a licensed physician. Isolated or sporadic use does not qualify. <br /> <br /> federalregister.gov +2</td></tr><tr><td>Definition of "Addicted"</td><td>A person who uses a controlled substance and has lost the power of self-control with reference to its use. <br /> <br /> americas1stfreedom.org</td><td>A person who uses a controlled substance and demonstrates a pattern of compulsively using it, characterized by impaired control over use. <br /> <br /> mrcolionnoir.com +1</td></tr><tr><td>Temporal Scope</td><td>Unlawful use must have occurred recently enough to indicate active engagement, but not limited to the exact moment of firearm possession. Inferences could apply to events up to 5 years prior in some cases. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +1</td><td>Emphasizes "continuing into the present." Remote, infrequent, or ceased use does not prohibit. Use under medical supervision or prescription is excluded. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +2</td></tr><tr><td>Inferences and Examples</td><td>Included specific inferences for current use, such as: a conviction for use or possession within the past year; multiple arrests within the past 5 years (with the most recent within the past year); or a positive drug test within the past year. This led to denials based on single incidents. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +2</td><td>Removes all inference examples. Requires evidence of a "pattern of use" rather than single incidents. Aims to reduce erroneous National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) denials. <br /> <br /> federalregister.gov +2</td></tr><tr><td>Impact on NICS Denials</td><td>Resulted in broader denials; e.g., in FY 2025, 9,163 firearm transfers were denied under this category, often based on inferences. <br /> <br /> community.usconcealedcarry.com</td><td>Expected to narrow denials to cases with proven ongoing patterns, potentially reducing denials for isolated or past use. Aligns with court rulings requiring regular, contemporaneous use. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +2</td></tr><tr><td>Rationale for Change</td><td>N/A (original rule from 1997).</td><td>Responds to federal court decisions rejecting broad inferences; prepares for potential U.S. Supreme Court review in cases like U.S. v. Hemani. Reflects state-level marijuana liberalization while maintaining federal prohibitions on Schedule I substances. <br /> <br /> nraila.org +2</td></tr></table><p>Additional Notes</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Controlled substances include federally scheduled drugs like marijuana (still Schedule I as of February 2026, despite ongoing rescheduling discussions). State-legal use does not override federal prohibitions.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The new rule does not legalize firearm possession for current unlawful users but narrows who qualifies as prohibited, potentially allowing more people with past or occasional use to pass background checks.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Enforcement will focus on evidence-based patterns for NICS determinations and prosecutions, reducing reliance on assumptions.</li> </ul><p>[MEDIA=youtube]YznaDydK7vY[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lycanthrope, post: 480331, member: 562"] BIG NEWS FOR GUN OWNERS who use weed and other controlled substances! (which definitely isnt me) The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regulates federal firearms prohibitions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which makes it unlawful for any person who is an "unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act) to possess, ship, transport, or receive firearms that have moved in interstate or foreign commerce. This stems from the Gun Control Act of 1968.The "old" rule refers to the 1997 ATF regulation (27 CFR § 478.11), which provided a broad interpretation allowing inferences of prohibited status based on single or isolated incidents within recent time frames. The "new" rule is an interim final rule published on January 22, 2026, in the Federal Register, effective immediately, which narrows the definition to require evidence of regular, ongoing use. This change aligns with federal court precedents emphasizing that the prohibition applies only to current, patterned behavior, not remote or sporadic use. Comments on the rule are accepted until June 30, 2026. [TABLE] [TR] [TH]Aspect[/TH] [TH]Old Rule (1997)[/TH] [TH]New Rule (2026)[/TH] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Definition of "Unlawful User"[/TD] [TD]A current user of a controlled substance in a manner other than as prescribed by a licensed physician. Use could be inferred from recent evidence or a pattern, but allowed broad application including single incidents. nraila.org +1[/TD] [TD]A person who regularly uses a controlled substance over an extended period of time continuing into the present, without a lawful prescription or in a manner substantially different from that prescribed by a licensed physician. Isolated or sporadic use does not qualify. federalregister.gov +2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Definition of "Addicted"[/TD] [TD]A person who uses a controlled substance and has lost the power of self-control with reference to its use. americas1stfreedom.org[/TD] [TD]A person who uses a controlled substance and demonstrates a pattern of compulsively using it, characterized by impaired control over use. mrcolionnoir.com +1[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Temporal Scope[/TD] [TD]Unlawful use must have occurred recently enough to indicate active engagement, but not limited to the exact moment of firearm possession. Inferences could apply to events up to 5 years prior in some cases. nraila.org +1[/TD] [TD]Emphasizes "continuing into the present." Remote, infrequent, or ceased use does not prohibit. Use under medical supervision or prescription is excluded. nraila.org +2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Inferences and Examples[/TD] [TD]Included specific inferences for current use, such as: a conviction for use or possession within the past year; multiple arrests within the past 5 years (with the most recent within the past year); or a positive drug test within the past year. This led to denials based on single incidents. nraila.org +2[/TD] [TD]Removes all inference examples. Requires evidence of a "pattern of use" rather than single incidents. Aims to reduce erroneous National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) denials. federalregister.gov +2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Impact on NICS Denials[/TD] [TD]Resulted in broader denials; e.g., in FY 2025, 9,163 firearm transfers were denied under this category, often based on inferences. community.usconcealedcarry.com[/TD] [TD]Expected to narrow denials to cases with proven ongoing patterns, potentially reducing denials for isolated or past use. Aligns with court rulings requiring regular, contemporaneous use. nraila.org +2[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]Rationale for Change[/TD] [TD]N/A (original rule from 1997).[/TD] [TD]Responds to federal court decisions rejecting broad inferences; prepares for potential U.S. Supreme Court review in cases like U.S. v. Hemani. Reflects state-level marijuana liberalization while maintaining federal prohibitions on Schedule I substances. nraila.org +2[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] Additional Notes [LIST] [*]Controlled substances include federally scheduled drugs like marijuana (still Schedule I as of February 2026, despite ongoing rescheduling discussions). State-legal use does not override federal prohibitions. [*]The new rule does not legalize firearm possession for current unlawful users but narrows who qualifies as prohibited, potentially allowing more people with past or occasional use to pass background checks. [*]Enforcement will focus on evidence-based patterns for NICS determinations and prosecutions, reducing reliance on assumptions. [/LIST] [MEDIA=youtube]YznaDydK7vY[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
26 minutes ago
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
42 minutes ago
Concealed carry
Latest: Whisky
43 minutes ago
Western ND river ice
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 3:31 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 3:28 PM
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 3:01 PM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Today at 2:12 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: KDM
Today at 9:47 AM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Today at 6:25 AM
Hobby
Latest: Maddog
Today at 5:10 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Yesterday at 3:24 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Maddog
Wednesday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: wslayer
Wednesday at 4:36 PM
T
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Traxion
Wednesday at 12:52 PM
Newbie here.
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 9:00 PM
What are these things?
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 8:27 PM
S
F 150 Owners
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 6:50 PM
S
Backyard chickens?
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 4:11 PM
sharpening auger blades
Latest: risingsun
Tuesday at 3:58 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Marijuana News Tidbits
Top
Bottom