What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dean nelson" data-source="post: 220426" data-attributes="member: 1305"><p>Question for you. Flipping through the flow rates through Bismarck the last week and a half or so and see a general 2500 to 2800 cfs number larger the the actual release amount. Now obviously anytime they're uping the release it is going to cause a few days time where it's almost impossible to correlate one with the other with any real accuracy. but I was just curious if that number is accurate for the amount of water entering the system between here in the dam or if it's just a quark on our gauge overestimating flows through town?</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>I might be wrong here but I'm pretty sure he was just using that as an example not as some sort of a statistically ongoing fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dean nelson, post: 220426, member: 1305"] Question for you. Flipping through the flow rates through Bismarck the last week and a half or so and see a general 2500 to 2800 cfs number larger the the actual release amount. Now obviously anytime they're uping the release it is going to cause a few days time where it's almost impossible to correlate one with the other with any real accuracy. but I was just curious if that number is accurate for the amount of water entering the system between here in the dam or if it's just a quark on our gauge overestimating flows through town? [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I might be wrong here but I'm pretty sure he was just using that as an example not as some sort of a statistically ongoing fact. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
D
Which one you did this?
Latest: Dryfly36
12 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 5:45 PM
N
Outdoor photo request
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 4:28 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 1:09 PM
S
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: snow2
Today at 9:46 AM
Deer speeds.
Latest: Kurtr
Today at 9:08 AM
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 8:25 AM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 2:39 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
Top
Bottom