What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JayKay" data-source="post: 220569" data-attributes="member: 324"><p>Honestly, there is some truth to Allen's reasoning. </p><p></p><p>About 10 years ago I hit a barely-under-water jetty, right in town in Bismarck. Caught me completely by surprise and I felt that it ought to have been marked. Contacted Game and Fish, and Corp of Engineers, since this jetty was obviously man-made.</p><p></p><p>I was told (nicely) that they don't mark them. If it is marked, and the marker is dislodged or removed, they can then be held liable. Not only that, but if they mark one, and not another, they can be held liable. So, clearly, it was in their official best interest not to mark hazards. I understand this.</p><p></p><p>A private citizen can mark any old dead-head or sandbar that they want, but ultimately it is up to the boat operator to either move slowly if they are uncertain of hazards, or.. simply crash their boat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JayKay, post: 220569, member: 324"] Honestly, there is some truth to Allen's reasoning. About 10 years ago I hit a barely-under-water jetty, right in town in Bismarck. Caught me completely by surprise and I felt that it ought to have been marked. Contacted Game and Fish, and Corp of Engineers, since this jetty was obviously man-made. I was told (nicely) that they don't mark them. If it is marked, and the marker is dislodged or removed, they can then be held liable. Not only that, but if they mark one, and not another, they can be held liable. So, clearly, it was in their official best interest not to mark hazards. I understand this. A private citizen can mark any old dead-head or sandbar that they want, but ultimately it is up to the boat operator to either move slowly if they are uncertain of hazards, or.. simply crash their boat. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
6.5 Creedmore
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 12:32 AM
P
Anyone snare rabbits?
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 10:19 PM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:51 PM
Deer speeds.
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 9:05 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
N
Crazy Fingers
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 2:39 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 9:10 AM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:08 AM
N
Any ice reports?
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 6:34 AM
P
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: Pheasant 54
Friday at 10:44 PM
It's been a good season.
Latest: grumster
Friday at 9:00 PM
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Kurtr
Friday at 2:03 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
Friday at 11:17 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Thursday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Thursday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Thursday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Thursday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 2:52 PM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 12:18 AM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
Top
Bottom