What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JayKay" data-source="post: 220569" data-attributes="member: 324"><p>Honestly, there is some truth to Allen's reasoning. </p><p></p><p>About 10 years ago I hit a barely-under-water jetty, right in town in Bismarck. Caught me completely by surprise and I felt that it ought to have been marked. Contacted Game and Fish, and Corp of Engineers, since this jetty was obviously man-made.</p><p></p><p>I was told (nicely) that they don't mark them. If it is marked, and the marker is dislodged or removed, they can then be held liable. Not only that, but if they mark one, and not another, they can be held liable. So, clearly, it was in their official best interest not to mark hazards. I understand this.</p><p></p><p>A private citizen can mark any old dead-head or sandbar that they want, but ultimately it is up to the boat operator to either move slowly if they are uncertain of hazards, or.. simply crash their boat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JayKay, post: 220569, member: 324"] Honestly, there is some truth to Allen's reasoning. About 10 years ago I hit a barely-under-water jetty, right in town in Bismarck. Caught me completely by surprise and I felt that it ought to have been marked. Contacted Game and Fish, and Corp of Engineers, since this jetty was obviously man-made. I was told (nicely) that they don't mark them. If it is marked, and the marker is dislodged or removed, they can then be held liable. Not only that, but if they mark one, and not another, they can be held liable. So, clearly, it was in their official best interest not to mark hazards. I understand this. A private citizen can mark any old dead-head or sandbar that they want, but ultimately it is up to the boat operator to either move slowly if they are uncertain of hazards, or.. simply crash their boat. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Spring has sprung-
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
36 minutes ago
Sucker Minnows
Latest: KDM
38 minutes ago
G
Boat carpet
Latest: Griz
Today at 6:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Today at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 3:48 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: 5575
Today at 3:30 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 3:16 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Today at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Today at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Today at 11:40 AM
M
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: measure-it
Today at 8:21 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:46 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:57 PM
W
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: woodduck30
Yesterday at 7:47 PM
L
Chuck Norris~
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 6:13 PM
I finally won a gun
Latest: cooter00
Yesterday at 3:26 PM
Taylor Sheridan
Latest: Vollmer
Yesterday at 10:05 AM
YT Divorce Eggs
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 9:15 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Saturday at 7:33 PM
Standout: The Ben Kjar Story
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 2:10 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Missouri River rise
Top
Bottom