What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND suppressor laws update?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="USMCGrunt" data-source="post: 495106" data-attributes="member: 8470"><p>Now that the lawsuit, Jensen v. ATF, has been ruled in our favor, what are the odds that our legislature would update our laws in regards to suppressors, short barreled rifles and shotguns? Currently, ND State Century Code Title 62.1-02-03 which states:</p><p></p><p><em>A person who possesses, obtains, receives, sells, or uses a short-barreled rifle or a short-barreled shotgun is guilty of a class C felony. This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer who possesses, obtains, receives, sells, or uses a short-barreled rifle or a short-barreled shotgun in the course of or in connection with the officer's official duties, to a member of the armed forces of the United States or national guard, organized reserves, state defense forces, or state guard organizations who possesses or uses a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun issued to the member by that organization and while on official duty, or to any person who complies with the National Firearms Act [<a href="https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000546&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I6b299940daa811e9a96fc1d92a78b9b3&cite=26USCAS5801" target="_blank">26 U.S.C. 5801</a>-<a href="https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000546&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I6b299941daa811e9a96fc1d92a78b9b3&cite=26USCAS5872" target="_blank">5872</a>].</em></p><p></p><p>The last line “or to any person who complies with the National Firearms Act…” would imply that one would still have to submit a Form 1 for SBR/SBS or a Form 4 for suppressors to the ATF for approval including the waiting time for those forms to be approved. Now there is no longer a $200 tax stamp for these firearms or accessories prior to the verdict which recognizes these as protected under the Second Amendment. So, what has changed for us now as compared to this ruling? What have we won? Nothing that I can see. North Dakota was party to this lawsuit yet remains 1 of 15 states where nothing has changed. Other states are now able to fill out a Form 4473 (same one we use to buy any long gun or handgun) and walk out that same day without the bureaucratic red tape and waiting times we are subject to.</p><p>What would be the chances that our lawmakers in Bismarck would strike this last line or this paragraph in its entirety? There is a special session scheduled for I believe in September and it would be great to see one of our legislators take up the lead in getting this obsolete law stricken from the books so we can once and for all relegate it to the dust bin of history!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="USMCGrunt, post: 495106, member: 8470"] Now that the lawsuit, Jensen v. ATF, has been ruled in our favor, what are the odds that our legislature would update our laws in regards to suppressors, short barreled rifles and shotguns? Currently, ND State Century Code Title 62.1-02-03 which states: [I]A person who possesses, obtains, receives, sells, or uses a short-barreled rifle or a short-barreled shotgun is guilty of a class C felony. This section does not apply to a law enforcement officer who possesses, obtains, receives, sells, or uses a short-barreled rifle or a short-barreled shotgun in the course of or in connection with the officer's official duties, to a member of the armed forces of the United States or national guard, organized reserves, state defense forces, or state guard organizations who possesses or uses a short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun issued to the member by that organization and while on official duty, or to any person who complies with the National Firearms Act [[URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000546&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I6b299940daa811e9a96fc1d92a78b9b3&cite=26USCAS5801']26 U.S.C. 5801[/URL]-[URL='https://1.next.westlaw.com/Link/Document/FullText?findType=L&originatingContext=document&transitionType=DocumentItem&pubNum=1000546&refType=LQ&originatingDoc=I6b299941daa811e9a96fc1d92a78b9b3&cite=26USCAS5872']5872[/URL]].[/I] The last line “or to any person who complies with the National Firearms Act…” would imply that one would still have to submit a Form 1 for SBR/SBS or a Form 4 for suppressors to the ATF for approval including the waiting time for those forms to be approved. Now there is no longer a $200 tax stamp for these firearms or accessories prior to the verdict which recognizes these as protected under the Second Amendment. So, what has changed for us now as compared to this ruling? What have we won? Nothing that I can see. North Dakota was party to this lawsuit yet remains 1 of 15 states where nothing has changed. Other states are now able to fill out a Form 4473 (same one we use to buy any long gun or handgun) and walk out that same day without the bureaucratic red tape and waiting times we are subject to. What would be the chances that our lawmakers in Bismarck would strike this last line or this paragraph in its entirety? There is a special session scheduled for I believe in September and it would be great to see one of our legislators take up the lead in getting this obsolete law stricken from the books so we can once and for all relegate it to the dust bin of history! [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Bear Again
Latest: KDM
Today at 12:30 AM
Gasoline pump prices
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 10:21 PM
Ham/Women
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 10:13 PM
S
ISO - Brittany Pup
Latest: SLE
Yesterday at 9:45 PM
P
Sale
6.5 Creed Barrel - Savage
Latest: Prairie Doggin'
Yesterday at 8:58 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 8:32 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:13 PM
Sharptails/Huns with labradors
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:30 PM
Metal roof or shingles?
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 4:45 PM
ISO Vizsla pup
Latest: Yoby
Yesterday at 3:17 PM
migration 26
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 12:37 PM
Fall fishing?
Latest: sdwxman
Yesterday at 8:43 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 6:30 AM
A
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 6:02 AM
Scheels Bismarck
Latest: Slappy
Monday at 11:01 PM
Pronghorn
Latest: Maddog
Monday at 6:52 PM
DUI Attorney
Latest: Obi-Wan
Monday at 2:31 AM
Lotsa bots
Latest: Davy Crockett
Sunday at 8:43 PM
T
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: Twitch
Sunday at 7:24 PM
Sale
Ford Tailgate bench
Latest: wslayer
Sunday at 5:33 PM
Sale
STEINER Predator 12 x 50
Latest: 1lessdog
Saturday at 4:27 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
ND suppressor laws update?
Top
Bottom