Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 256966" data-attributes="member: 337">I'm still not seeing where anyone is saying &quot;take the record away!&quot; based on hearsay. I have seen many say that it should be reviewed because of the previous record-holder and general fairness concerns and there's seemingly legitimate claims it was snagged.Interesting question for you: Why does this type of shit get you butt-hurt enough to chime in on it again? Including admonishment for certain viewpoints - if it affects you not at all? You have to admit it appears a tad hypocritical. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Admit it - it's a fascinating subject - like a blown call at the Superbowl. People like to debate this type of thing. I know Vollmer is enjoying the long thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 256966, member: 337"] I'm still not seeing where anyone is saying "take the record away!" based on hearsay. I have seen many say that it should be reviewed because of the previous record-holder and general fairness concerns and there's seemingly legitimate claims it was snagged. Interesting question for you: Why does this type of shit get [B]you [/B]butt-hurt enough to chime in on it again? Including admonishment for certain viewpoints - if it affects you not at all? You have to admit it appears a tad hypocritical. :) Admit it - it's a fascinating subject - like a blown call at the Superbowl. People like to debate this type of thing. I know Vollmer is enjoying the long thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA