What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
No To Hunting; Yes To Culling Of Deer Herds Read More: No To Hunting; Yes To Culling
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lunkerslayer" data-source="post: 289775" data-attributes="member: 217"><p>For many years hunters and groups that support hunters have been relentlessly telling the unbelievers that hunting deer is needed to keep the deer herds in check. These groups of people just will not believe the educated ones.</p><p></p><p>Now the Lansing State Journal is reporting that East Lansing City Officials last Tuesday voted to authorize the culling of the deer herds. To those who may not know what culling the herd means; that means hiring sharpshooters who would kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city </p><p></p><p>For many years hunters and groups that support hunters have been relentlessly telling the unbelievers that hunting deer is needed to keep the deer herds in check. These groups of people just will not believe the educated ones.</p><p></p><p>Now the Lansing State Journal is reporting that East Lansing City Officials last Tuesday voted to authorize the culling of the deer herds. To those who may not know what culling the herd means; that means hiring sharpshooters who would kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city parks.</p><p></p><p>By hiring that means instead of hunters paying for the chance to hunt and kill a deer, the taxpayers of East Lansing has to pay the $6,000 it will cost for this round of culling. When the cull happens the city manager would partner with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services to bring in those taxpayer-paid sharpshooters who will kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city parks.</p><p></p><p>It gets even better for all those who are against hunters and hunting, the East Lansing City Manager George Lahanas said the city most likely will not budget $6,000 but closer to $20,000 in case the culling program would be needed in more areas of the city and for a longer period.</p><p></p><p>The problem with the increasing deer population comes from the fact that they are destroying gardens, vegetation, and increased vehicular crashes.</p><p></p><p>During the debate Council member Mark Meadows said:</p><p></p><p>"This is not a vote, for me, based on whether hostas are eaten…There comes a point in time where there isn't enough food for the deer, and I think controlling the population at this point in time is an appropriate way for us to go forward."</p><p></p><p>That my friends is exactly what hunters and the groups that support hunters have been saying for decades. When there is a protected species with no natural predators the herds will grow beyond them being able to sustain themselves.</p><p></p><p>Once again I reiterate the taxpayers of East Lansing have to pay for the killing of the deer instead of hunters paying for the opportunity to do so. It sounds exactly like “good government” to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="https://wbckfm.com/no-to-hunting-yes-to-culling-of-deer-herds/" target="_blank">https://wbckfm.com/no-to-hunting-yes-to-culling-of-deer-herds/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lunkerslayer, post: 289775, member: 217"] For many years hunters and groups that support hunters have been relentlessly telling the unbelievers that hunting deer is needed to keep the deer herds in check. These groups of people just will not believe the educated ones. Now the Lansing State Journal is reporting that East Lansing City Officials last Tuesday voted to authorize the culling of the deer herds. To those who may not know what culling the herd means; that means hiring sharpshooters who would kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city For many years hunters and groups that support hunters have been relentlessly telling the unbelievers that hunting deer is needed to keep the deer herds in check. These groups of people just will not believe the educated ones. Now the Lansing State Journal is reporting that East Lansing City Officials last Tuesday voted to authorize the culling of the deer herds. To those who may not know what culling the herd means; that means hiring sharpshooters who would kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city parks. By hiring that means instead of hunters paying for the chance to hunt and kill a deer, the taxpayers of East Lansing has to pay the $6,000 it will cost for this round of culling. When the cull happens the city manager would partner with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services to bring in those taxpayer-paid sharpshooters who will kill the deer in specialized hunts in the city parks. It gets even better for all those who are against hunters and hunting, the East Lansing City Manager George Lahanas said the city most likely will not budget $6,000 but closer to $20,000 in case the culling program would be needed in more areas of the city and for a longer period. The problem with the increasing deer population comes from the fact that they are destroying gardens, vegetation, and increased vehicular crashes. During the debate Council member Mark Meadows said: "This is not a vote, for me, based on whether hostas are eaten…There comes a point in time where there isn't enough food for the deer, and I think controlling the population at this point in time is an appropriate way for us to go forward." That my friends is exactly what hunters and the groups that support hunters have been saying for decades. When there is a protected species with no natural predators the herds will grow beyond them being able to sustain themselves. Once again I reiterate the taxpayers of East Lansing have to pay for the killing of the deer instead of hunters paying for the opportunity to do so. It sounds exactly like “good government” to me. [url]https://wbckfm.com/no-to-hunting-yes-to-culling-of-deer-herds/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Wind
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 11:14 AM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Today at 10:27 AM
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 9:02 AM
Jamestown reservoir
Latest: CrappieHunter
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: 7mmMag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
T
24 volt Strikemaster power hea
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 5:46 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:10 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:59 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 8:47 AM
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:44 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Thursday at 9:58 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Thursday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 6:48 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Thursday at 1:05 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Big Game Hunting
Deer
No To Hunting; Yes To Culling Of Deer Herds Read More: No To Hunting; Yes To Culling
Top
Bottom