Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 231600" data-attributes="member: 389">Oh, I think there are plenty of pay to hunt places in SD.&nbsp; I do wonder though if it's more than what we already have in ND?One big difference though is that in SD you are allowed to ditch hunt.&nbsp; The general thought up here is that the ditches remain under the control of the adjoining landowner, who does actually still own the ditch.&nbsp; So if the land on the side of the road is posted, the ditch is also closed to hunting unless it's a federal or state road where the land the road sits on is actually owned by the public.&nbsp; And go ahead and try to find a coherent map of those roads!- - - Updated - - -No.&nbsp; The legislature can surely do it.&nbsp; Initiated measures are generally for topics the legislature doesn't want to tackle, for whatever reason.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Allen, post: 231600, member: 389"] Oh, I think there are plenty of pay to hunt places in SD. I do wonder though if it's more than what we already have in ND? One big difference though is that in SD you are allowed to ditch hunt. The general thought up here is that the ditches remain under the control of the adjoining landowner, who does actually still own the ditch. So if the land on the side of the road is posted, the ditch is also closed to hunting unless it's a federal or state road where the land the road sits on is actually owned by the public. And go ahead and try to find a coherent map of those roads! [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] No. The legislature can surely do it. Initiated measures are generally for topics the legislature doesn't want to tackle, for whatever reason. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA