Outfitters vs hunters again

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,678
Likes
1,346
Points
558
Location
Drifting the high plains
Montana is at a crossroads in our management of wildlife. We will either maintain our decades-long tradition in which everyone has equal opportunity to enjoy our public wildlife, or we hand control to a handful of wealthy landowners and outfitters to pick who gets to hunt.
















icon_adchoices.png

Skip Ad


A bill pending in the state Legislature would allow unlimited elk “B” cow elk tags in some areas to residents, and give non-residents who draw a bull elk license a second cow elk tag, in addition to the one they’re already guaranteed based on a law passed a couple years ago. There are no sideboards on which areas would be allocated these tags, leaving the discretion to the Fish and Wildlife Commission.

What’s really going on here is the privatization of our public wildlife resources to cater to a handful of large outfitters and landowners. SB 270 would create a system in which outfitters control nearly every aspect of wildlife, to their benefit to sell trophy hunts while elk herds continue to grow over the objectives set by the state. It was brought by the Montana Conservation Society, a dark money group run by an out-of-state lobbyist, outfitters and large landowners.

Sound wildlife management is based on getting a broad harvest of big game, spreading wildlife out across the landscape, and distributing hunters to ensure fair chase, ethical hunting. That requires a partnership between landowners and hunters. If a landowner has issues with the public’s wildlife, the public hunter needs to be part of the solution.

What’s the common denominator in these areas where some landowners are complaining about an overpopulation of elk? It’s locking the public out from its wildlife and purposely harboring animals to sell trophy hunts. The result when no cow elk are taken throughout the general season is burgeoning herds. This bill creates an incentive for landowners to harbor huge elk herds to profit off of them.

SB 270 would allow wealthy landowners who restrict all public hunting access to pick and choose who hunts, allocate tags for their friends, and facilitate elk culls by employees. Public hunting opportunity for what are supposed to be public resources would be eliminated.

It’s not far-fetched. In Europe, a few aristocrats come out to kill trophies. Then landowner staffers are brought in to kill hundreds of animals when they reach high population levels.

That approach isn’t just limited to Europe. In Wyoming, state wildlife officials are already culling elk on private ranches. Idaho took a similar approach several years ago, gunning down more than 200 elk in a night in what it called an experiment.

This is just the latest move by outfitters and wealthy landowners to privatize public wildlife. They’ve pushed through landowner licenses based on acreage, expanded elk “shoulder seasons” that last six months, and given preference to non-resident hunters who hire an outfitter.

SB 270 represents the next step in destroying the public trust doctrine for our wildlife, in which it’s held by the state for all citizens, and making us a system in which people buy access. It would end decades of cooperation that made Montana successful in managing our elk for everyone.

Write your state House and Senate member and tell them to vote NO on SB 270.
 


SDMF

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,203
Likes
1,067
Points
563
Write your state House and Senate member and tell them to vote NO on SB 270.
Your voice and my voice don't count, and shouldn't. This is an issue for MT residents to manage with their legislators.

I've obtained 20 different big game tags in MT since 2001, 17 of those being Elk/Deer combos. In no way does that give me a voice in what Montanans decide to do with Montana.

I sincerely hope that MT resident DIY hunters see NR DIY hunters as their ally, but, in the end, it's their state and NR's gotta play by the rules they set forth.

Seems it'd be awful arrogant of me to think that any MT resident hunter give a flying fornication what I think.
 

badlands13

Established Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2018
Posts
118
Likes
15
Points
103
Location
Dickinson
Your voice and my voice don't count, and shouldn't. This is an issue for MT residents to manage with their legislators.

I've obtained 20 different big game tags in MT since 2001, 17 of those being Elk/Deer combos. In no way does that give me a voice in what Montanans decide to do with Montana.

I sincerely hope that MT resident DIY hunters see NR DIY hunters as their ally, but, in the end, it's their state and NR's gotta play by the rules they set forth.

Seems it'd be awful arrogant of me to think that any MT resident hunter give a flying fornication what I think.
Good chance he just did a cut and paste. There are people from Montana on this site. Doesn't hurt to highlight it. Shoot, if you are on other hunting websites like Rokslide and Hunttalk, they discuss all kinds of wildlife issues in a bunch of states. It doesn't mean they are all arrogant.
 

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,678
Likes
1,346
Points
558
Location
Drifting the high plains
Your voice and my voice don't count, and shouldn't. This is an issue for MT residents to manage with their legislators.

I've obtained 20 different big game tags in MT since 2001, 17 of those being Elk/Deer combos. In no way does that give me a voice in what Montanans decide to do with Montana.

I sincerely hope that MT resident DIY hunters see NR DIY hunters as their ally, but, in the end, it's their state and NR's gotta play by the rules they set forth.

Seems it'd be awful arrogant of me to think that any MT resident hunter give a flying fornication what I think.
I'm fully aware, but what radicals do in other states is only years from happening in other states. Montana reside ts need to be aware now, and nonresidents need to know what's coming. I should have used quotation marks so people didn't think they were v my words. They were written by a Montana resident.
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 326
  • This month: 168
  • This month: 106
  • This month: 76
  • This month: 62
  • This month: 62
  • This month: 52
  • This month: 51
  • This month: 44
  • This month: 42
Top Bottom