Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kentucky Windage" data-source="post: 428149" data-attributes="member: 429">Oh man,&nbsp; here we go….i’m a no vote for the property tax measure. It’s too vaguely written and benefits corporate businesses and the like. I can’t argue with the over taxation of our residential properties, but to rid our state of property taxes in the way this bill was written is foolish. There are too many outside interest groups pushing for it. That should raise a red flag.&nbsp; My hope is that it’s voted down by the people and the ND elect sees that changes must be made and do so accordingly in this year’s legislative session. If they fail to do so, then let’s vote on a measure that addresses what’s best for every resident and community we call home.&nbsp; This measure is sexy to most, but it’s brush stroke is too wide.&nbsp; A yes vote with how this measure is written will create more harm than good. I completely agree with less taxes, less spending, and less government, but we have to use sensible logic to accomplish this. I am not for and never will be for replacing one tax with another. There has to be answer for how will we pay for the things that are needed upfront instead of afterwards. I hope this measure up for a vote sends that message……..</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kentucky Windage, post: 428149, member: 429"] Oh man, here we go….i’m a no vote for the property tax measure. It’s too vaguely written and benefits corporate businesses and the like. I can’t argue with the over taxation of our residential properties, but to rid our state of property taxes in the way this bill was written is foolish. There are too many outside interest groups pushing for it. That should raise a red flag. My hope is that it’s voted down by the people and the ND elect sees that changes must be made and do so accordingly in this year’s legislative session. If they fail to do so, then let’s vote on a measure that addresses what’s best for every resident and community we call home. This measure is sexy to most, but it’s brush stroke is too wide. A yes vote with how this measure is written will create more harm than good. I completely agree with less taxes, less spending, and less government, but we have to use sensible logic to accomplish this. I am not for and never will be for replacing one tax with another. There has to be answer for how will we pay for the things that are needed upfront instead of afterwards. I hope this measure up for a vote sends that message…….. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA