What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Thanks for the topsoil!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 95433" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>It will be interesting to see what things look like for them this year. The last 7 years have been much different than what is coming down the pike. </p><p></p><p>Whether people in ag wish to admit it, the Federal crop insurance program has been the catalyst for the downfall of production ag. </p><p></p><p>It is much like a snake eating itself by it's own tail. </p><p></p><p>Everytime the insurance program comes up with a figure of revenue assurance land rents and inputs follow right to that figure. </p><p></p><p>When there are guaranteed revenues everyone wants their piece of the pie for chemicals and fert. and do the math just like the farmer figuring how much more he can pay for cash rent over his neighbor based on the differences in proven yields and base rates. </p><p></p><p>These insurnace programs have encouraged lands that would be better off in grass to be rented for much higher rents and broken up and farmed. That in turn has led to less diversification in ag and the consequences of "all your eggs in one basket" problems that creates. it also impacts markets, especially the "specialty crops we raise here in ND that do not have the huge market corn,wheat and soybeans have. </p><p></p><p>CRP acres coming out impacted these specialty markets significantly on some crops. A few hundred thousand acres makes a big impact on some of these markets. </p><p></p><p>Then the insurance plans themselves are screwy. Under the Prevent plant insurance, you could not seed a cover crop and use it for any value. So the incentive to plant a cover crop and help mitigate water issues so insurance risks for being wet were lowered was penalized rather than promoted. But then it is a Federal program so what can we expect. Combine that with a younger generation that do not wish to engage in the type labor involved in diversified operations or that commitment of time ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 95433, member: 373"] It will be interesting to see what things look like for them this year. The last 7 years have been much different than what is coming down the pike. Whether people in ag wish to admit it, the Federal crop insurance program has been the catalyst for the downfall of production ag. It is much like a snake eating itself by it's own tail. Everytime the insurance program comes up with a figure of revenue assurance land rents and inputs follow right to that figure. When there are guaranteed revenues everyone wants their piece of the pie for chemicals and fert. and do the math just like the farmer figuring how much more he can pay for cash rent over his neighbor based on the differences in proven yields and base rates. These insurnace programs have encouraged lands that would be better off in grass to be rented for much higher rents and broken up and farmed. That in turn has led to less diversification in ag and the consequences of "all your eggs in one basket" problems that creates. it also impacts markets, especially the "specialty crops we raise here in ND that do not have the huge market corn,wheat and soybeans have. CRP acres coming out impacted these specialty markets significantly on some crops. A few hundred thousand acres makes a big impact on some of these markets. Then the insurance plans themselves are screwy. Under the Prevent plant insurance, you could not seed a cover crop and use it for any value. So the incentive to plant a cover crop and help mitigate water issues so insurance risks for being wet were lowered was penalized rather than promoted. But then it is a Federal program so what can we expect. Combine that with a younger generation that do not wish to engage in the type labor involved in diversified operations or that commitment of time ... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Gm
Latest: shorthairsrus
Yesterday at 10:39 PM
O
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: ORCUS DEMENS
Yesterday at 8:19 PM
C
Oahe 26
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 8:15 PM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 7:49 PM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 6:47 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 6:20 PM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 6:10 PM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 5:51 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
POS
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 5:43 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Rut2much
Yesterday at 5:03 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Yesterday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Yesterday at 10:18 AM
S
Morels
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 9:02 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Monday at 1:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Thanks for the topsoil!
Top
Bottom