What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
The time to stock up is now.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bed Wetter" data-source="post: 247428" data-attributes="member: 428"><p>223 rifles were adopted for battlefield combat. Smaller bullets = more bullets per lb. A soldier is often stuck with what he can carry. Smaller bullets = more bullets. It doesn’t matter how big your bullets are if you don’t have any. That’s why I carry a 9mm and not a .45 ACP</p><p></p><p>223 is enough to disable an adversary on the battlefield. Not great for distance or barrier penetration but infantryman operate in squads. Squads also have a machine gunner and often a designated marksman, each of which use different rifles than the standard infantrymen.</p><p></p><p>In principle, I agree with you. If I had to huff it alone, I might be more inclined to pick up a .308 AR. But consider this: 270 rounds of 223 (that’s 9x 30rd mags) weighs less than 10 lbs. What do you suppose 34 clips (272 rds) of 30-06 weighs?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bed Wetter, post: 247428, member: 428"] 223 rifles were adopted for battlefield combat. Smaller bullets = more bullets per lb. A soldier is often stuck with what he can carry. Smaller bullets = more bullets. It doesn’t matter how big your bullets are if you don’t have any. That’s why I carry a 9mm and not a .45 ACP 223 is enough to disable an adversary on the battlefield. Not great for distance or barrier penetration but infantryman operate in squads. Squads also have a machine gunner and often a designated marksman, each of which use different rifles than the standard infantrymen. In principle, I agree with you. If I had to huff it alone, I might be more inclined to pick up a .308 AR. But consider this: 270 rounds of 223 (that’s 9x 30rd mags) weighs less than 10 lbs. What do you suppose 34 clips (272 rds) of 30-06 weighs? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
S
Heated jackets
Latest: snow2
Today at 6:54 PM
S
F 150 Owners
Latest: snow2
Today at 6:50 PM
N
What are these things?
Latest: NodakBob
Today at 6:23 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 5:58 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Vollmer
Today at 5:10 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: Colt45
Today at 4:25 PM
S
Backyard chickens?
Latest: snow2
Today at 4:11 PM
sharpening auger blades
Latest: risingsun
Today at 3:58 PM
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Today at 2:29 PM
Newbie here.
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 1:35 PM
L
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 1:26 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 12:45 PM
S
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: savage270
Today at 12:43 PM
D
Catfish anyone?
Latest: Downrigger
Today at 8:08 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Today at 7:46 AM
Seekins rifles
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 3:23 PM
Tire inflator
Latest: 5575
Yesterday at 1:09 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 9:33 AM
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
L
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 2:37 AM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Sunday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Sunday at 9:35 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
The time to stock up is now.
Top
Bottom