What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
The time to stock up is now.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bed Wetter" data-source="post: 247428" data-attributes="member: 428"><p>223 rifles were adopted for battlefield combat. Smaller bullets = more bullets per lb. A soldier is often stuck with what he can carry. Smaller bullets = more bullets. It doesn’t matter how big your bullets are if you don’t have any. That’s why I carry a 9mm and not a .45 ACP</p><p></p><p>223 is enough to disable an adversary on the battlefield. Not great for distance or barrier penetration but infantryman operate in squads. Squads also have a machine gunner and often a designated marksman, each of which use different rifles than the standard infantrymen.</p><p></p><p>In principle, I agree with you. If I had to huff it alone, I might be more inclined to pick up a .308 AR. But consider this: 270 rounds of 223 (that’s 9x 30rd mags) weighs less than 10 lbs. What do you suppose 34 clips (272 rds) of 30-06 weighs?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bed Wetter, post: 247428, member: 428"] 223 rifles were adopted for battlefield combat. Smaller bullets = more bullets per lb. A soldier is often stuck with what he can carry. Smaller bullets = more bullets. It doesn’t matter how big your bullets are if you don’t have any. That’s why I carry a 9mm and not a .45 ACP 223 is enough to disable an adversary on the battlefield. Not great for distance or barrier penetration but infantryman operate in squads. Squads also have a machine gunner and often a designated marksman, each of which use different rifles than the standard infantrymen. In principle, I agree with you. If I had to huff it alone, I might be more inclined to pick up a .308 AR. But consider this: 270 rounds of 223 (that’s 9x 30rd mags) weighs less than 10 lbs. What do you suppose 34 clips (272 rds) of 30-06 weighs? [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
31 minutes ago
MN walleye possession Limits
Latest: Rut2much
Today at 9:02 AM
L
Wind
Latest: LBrandt
Today at 8:53 AM
Jamestown reservoir
Latest: CrappieHunter
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: 7mmMag
Yesterday at 8:49 PM
StrikeMaster Maven-40v
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:05 PM
T
24 volt Strikemaster power hea
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 5:46 PM
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:10 AM
Look at the size of that deer
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 9:59 AM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 8:47 AM
MN Wolves
Latest: SDMF
Yesterday at 8:44 AM
Wolf Hunting?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 6:04 AM
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: Obi-Wan
Thursday at 9:58 PM
R
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: riverview
Thursday at 8:19 PM
Remote camera options
Latest: Wirehair
Thursday at 7:43 PM
Batten down the hatches!
Latest: lunkerslayer
Thursday at 6:48 PM
OAHE Ice 25/26
Latest: Kurtr
Thursday at 1:05 PM
Satellite Internet
Latest: grantfurness
Wednesday at 10:11 PM
R
Any ice reports?
Latest: riverview
Wednesday at 9:25 PM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Jiffy
Wednesday at 7:57 PM
Alkaline lake ice conditions?
Latest: NDSportsman
Wednesday at 2:55 PM
N
ION gen2 8"
Latest: ndrivrrat
Tuesday at 5:43 PM
Four legged tax deduction
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
Hunting
Guns and Ammo
The time to stock up is now.
Top
Bottom