What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tikkalover" data-source="post: 123890" data-attributes="member: 600"><p><strong>Judge orders environmental review of Dakota Access pipeline</strong> </p><p></p><p>FARGO, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a full environmental review of the Dakota Access pipeline, <strong>nearly three years after it began carrying oil</strong>.</p><p></p><p>U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that the easement approval for the pipeline remains “highly controversial” under federal environmental law, and a more extensive review is necessary than the environmental assessment that was done.</p><p></p><p>The pipeline was the subject of months of <a href="https://apnews.com/def6d4ae9bba429a99b0a7936c589b6b" target="_blank">protests</a>, sometimes violent, during its construction in late 2016 and early 2017 near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation that straddles the North Dakota-South Dakota border. The Standing Rock tribe continued to press litigation against the pipeline even after it began carrying oil from North Dakota across several states to a shipping point in Illinois in June 2017.</p><p></p><p>Boasberg ordered both parties to submit briefs on whether the pipeline should continue operating during the period of the new environmental review.</p><p></p><p>The $3.8 billion, 1,172-mile (1,886 kilometer) underground pipeline crosses beneath the Missouri River, just north of the Standing Rock reservation. The tribe draws its water from the river and fears pollution. Texas-based Energy Transfer insisted the pipeline would be safe.</p><p></p><p>The Standing Rock Sioux want the pipeline shut down and more study done. The Corps wanted Boasberg to rule in favor of its August 2018 finding that <a href="https://apnews.com/f45e909bf0af461fbcebfb453143f2bb" target="_blank">no more environmental study</a> was needed.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FF0000">What a joke!! ;:;banghead</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tikkalover, post: 123890, member: 600"] [B]Judge orders environmental review of Dakota Access pipeline[/B] FARGO, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a full environmental review of the Dakota Access pipeline, [B]nearly three years after it began carrying oil[/B]. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that the easement approval for the pipeline remains “highly controversial” under federal environmental law, and a more extensive review is necessary than the environmental assessment that was done. The pipeline was the subject of months of [URL="https://apnews.com/def6d4ae9bba429a99b0a7936c589b6b"]protests[/URL], sometimes violent, during its construction in late 2016 and early 2017 near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation that straddles the North Dakota-South Dakota border. The Standing Rock tribe continued to press litigation against the pipeline even after it began carrying oil from North Dakota across several states to a shipping point in Illinois in June 2017. Boasberg ordered both parties to submit briefs on whether the pipeline should continue operating during the period of the new environmental review. The $3.8 billion, 1,172-mile (1,886 kilometer) underground pipeline crosses beneath the Missouri River, just north of the Standing Rock reservation. The tribe draws its water from the river and fears pollution. Texas-based Energy Transfer insisted the pipeline would be safe. The Standing Rock Sioux want the pipeline shut down and more study done. The Corps wanted Boasberg to rule in favor of its August 2018 finding that [URL="https://apnews.com/f45e909bf0af461fbcebfb453143f2bb"]no more environmental study[/URL] was needed. [COLOR=#FF0000]What a joke!! ;:;banghead[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
C
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: camper
25 minutes ago
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: 1bigfokker
Today at 12:12 AM
Western ND river ice
Latest: 1bigfokker
Today at 12:07 AM
Hobby
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Davy Crockett
Yesterday at 11:37 PM
Concealed carry
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Customer service
Latest: jr2280
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Catfish anyone?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:15 PM
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:04 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 4:47 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 9:47 AM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 6:25 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Thursday at 3:24 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Maddog
Wednesday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: wslayer
Wednesday at 4:36 PM
T
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: Traxion
Wednesday at 12:52 PM
Newbie here.
Latest: svnmag
Tuesday at 9:00 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom