What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tikkalover" data-source="post: 123890" data-attributes="member: 600"><p><strong>Judge orders environmental review of Dakota Access pipeline</strong> </p><p></p><p>FARGO, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a full environmental review of the Dakota Access pipeline, <strong>nearly three years after it began carrying oil</strong>.</p><p></p><p>U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that the easement approval for the pipeline remains “highly controversial” under federal environmental law, and a more extensive review is necessary than the environmental assessment that was done.</p><p></p><p>The pipeline was the subject of months of <a href="https://apnews.com/def6d4ae9bba429a99b0a7936c589b6b" target="_blank">protests</a>, sometimes violent, during its construction in late 2016 and early 2017 near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation that straddles the North Dakota-South Dakota border. The Standing Rock tribe continued to press litigation against the pipeline even after it began carrying oil from North Dakota across several states to a shipping point in Illinois in June 2017.</p><p></p><p>Boasberg ordered both parties to submit briefs on whether the pipeline should continue operating during the period of the new environmental review.</p><p></p><p>The $3.8 billion, 1,172-mile (1,886 kilometer) underground pipeline crosses beneath the Missouri River, just north of the Standing Rock reservation. The tribe draws its water from the river and fears pollution. Texas-based Energy Transfer insisted the pipeline would be safe.</p><p></p><p>The Standing Rock Sioux want the pipeline shut down and more study done. The Corps wanted Boasberg to rule in favor of its August 2018 finding that <a href="https://apnews.com/f45e909bf0af461fbcebfb453143f2bb" target="_blank">no more environmental study</a> was needed.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: #FF0000">What a joke!! ;:;banghead</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tikkalover, post: 123890, member: 600"] [B]Judge orders environmental review of Dakota Access pipeline[/B] FARGO, N.D. (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday ordered the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a full environmental review of the Dakota Access pipeline, [B]nearly three years after it began carrying oil[/B]. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg wrote that the easement approval for the pipeline remains “highly controversial” under federal environmental law, and a more extensive review is necessary than the environmental assessment that was done. The pipeline was the subject of months of [URL="https://apnews.com/def6d4ae9bba429a99b0a7936c589b6b"]protests[/URL], sometimes violent, during its construction in late 2016 and early 2017 near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation that straddles the North Dakota-South Dakota border. The Standing Rock tribe continued to press litigation against the pipeline even after it began carrying oil from North Dakota across several states to a shipping point in Illinois in June 2017. Boasberg ordered both parties to submit briefs on whether the pipeline should continue operating during the period of the new environmental review. The $3.8 billion, 1,172-mile (1,886 kilometer) underground pipeline crosses beneath the Missouri River, just north of the Standing Rock reservation. The tribe draws its water from the river and fears pollution. Texas-based Energy Transfer insisted the pipeline would be safe. The Standing Rock Sioux want the pipeline shut down and more study done. The Corps wanted Boasberg to rule in favor of its August 2018 finding that [URL="https://apnews.com/f45e909bf0af461fbcebfb453143f2bb"]no more environmental study[/URL] was needed. [COLOR=#FF0000]What a joke!! ;:;banghead[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: Kurtr
Yesterday at 9:31 PM
R
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Ruttin
Yesterday at 8:53 PM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 8:41 PM
S
Spring has sprung-
Latest: snow2
Yesterday at 8:34 PM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:25 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Yesterday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Yesterday at 5:44 PM
Morels
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 11:54 AM
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Yesterday at 11:18 AM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Yesterday at 11:15 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 1:39 AM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Monday at 10:47 PM
Tea/Laxative?! YT
Latest: svnmag
Monday at 9:27 PM
Training for the outdoors
Latest: risingsun
Monday at 6:10 PM
N
Tritoon on a pontoon trailer?
Latest: NodakBob
Monday at 3:48 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Monday at 1:21 PM
K
Fishing in Valley City
Latest: kyle12bravo
Monday at 1:00 PM
Yellowstone
Latest: tikkalover
Monday at 11:40 AM
Reloader 26 For Sale
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Monday at 7:09 AM
Auroras from last night
Latest: 5575
Sunday at 11:04 PM
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: Allen
Sunday at 10:41 PM
A-10 2026 YT
Latest: svnmag
Sunday at 8:57 PM
W
Burleigh co. Ditches debate
Latest: woodduck30
Sunday at 7:47 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Well this is going to get interesting
Top
Bottom