I wasn't going to weigh in, but it's starting to look like a dog pile on kentucky windage and nobody has brought forth any evidence to counter this G&F law so I thought I would. If a person plans on sleeping in their fish house, it can be argued that this space has now become a dwelling similar to a camper or a hotel room and would then fall under the 4th amendment rules of unreasonable search and seizure requiring a warrant to enter without the permission of the occupant. The term "dwelling" falls under the term "house" which is the term used in the language of the 4th amendment of the Constitution. (All these terms were found in Blacks Law Dictionary 9th edition if you care to look.) So, if you deem your fish house a dwelling, no law enforcement officer can barge in without the occupants permission OR a warrant. There is further legal language that states if ANY law contradicts or violates the Constitution, that law is null and void. So, should a man want to challenge a game warden for barging into his dwelling WITHOUT a warrant or without permission, there IS fairly strong legal standing for the argument and Kentucky Windage is in no way a immature millennial libtard for questioning the legality of this law. Which is why I suspect most wardens knock, identify, and wait for permission. To do otherwise, may very well land them in a very sticky legal mess. The information is out there people, you just have to go look for it.