What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ndlongshot" data-source="post: 183584" data-attributes="member: 244"><p>The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ndlongshot, post: 183584, member: 244"] The Wyoming wilderness requiring a guide is probably a topic big enough for a separate thread. Its BS that federal taxpayers, (landowners), can't access the land they are required to pay to maintain. It's just a good lobby effort to funnel non res hunters through the guiding industry. Think of it as economic development. Bunch of crap. I dont care if they guide there, but dont close it down. Anyways, in regards to North Dakota, like others have said...it all depends on the details. I believe in the 70's much of the badlands qualified for wilderness status and now a very small amount does due to roads and energy development. Everything needs balance. Everything in moderation. I dont want roads on every section, but areas need to be able to have legitimate access points...and yes, honor the multiple use. As we have seen in other threads thats where things get sticky. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: svnmag
12 minutes ago
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: lunkerslayer
42 minutes ago
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Today at 8:18 PM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: grumster
Today at 7:57 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Today at 7:23 PM
Bank runs
Latest: grumster
Today at 7:12 PM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: 3Roosters
Today at 5:56 PM
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: SDMF
Today at 5:09 PM
Spring
Latest: grumster
Today at 3:11 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Today at 10:38 AM
Rain
Latest: Maddog
Today at 2:09 AM
You paddledoggers are quiet...
Latest: cooter00
Yesterday at 5:26 PM
Ruele Lake Boat Ramp
Latest: Shockwave
Yesterday at 1:34 PM
zero turn recommendations
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 12:52 PM
Heads up
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 9:39 AM
S
Minn Kota Ulterra DSC Lb $2500
Latest: Skeeter82
Yesterday at 9:31 AM
4
tanglefree solo blind
Latest: 4Buck
Yesterday at 8:14 AM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 2:12 AM
Any Birders here?
Latest: Allen
Yesterday at 1:50 AM
Columbia/NYPD
Latest: Fritz the Cat
Wednesday at 8:50 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Prairie legacy wilderness
Top
Bottom