What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
The Problem Facing ND Waterfowl Hunting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Account Deleted" data-source="post: 125137" data-attributes="member: 886"><p>I've looked into some stats going back as far as the NDGF has records. Here is a snippet for the last 10 years or so of available data (from when I requested it, there is probably 2015 data available now). These are estimates. There is no 100% accurate way of tracking resident waterfowl hunters right now. </p><p></p><p> Res. Non-Res.</p><p>2005 28,331 24,639</p><p>2006 26,560 22,277</p><p>2007 25,546 22,858</p><p>2008 24,001 18,485</p><p>2009 22,105 21,974</p><p>2010 22,664 23,624</p><p>2011 25,332 23,323</p><p>2012 25,789 23,756</p><p>2013 23,899 24,295</p><p>2014 23,606 24,252</p><p></p><p>As you can see, numbers are fairly stable. Some years there are more residents than nonresidents, some years not. You have to look back farther to see where the problem started (mid-90s).</p><p></p><p>Starting in the mid-90s, there was an explosion of non-resident waterfowl hunters. In 1994 there was about 10,000 NR hunters. By 1999, there was 21,000. By 2001, there was 30,000. That was about the peak and there was a slight downturn and now a stabilization statistically speaking. The increase coincided with MN waterfowl hunting going to shit. Their water quality took a dump and so did the duck hunting. The migration shifted west and so did the duck hunters. ND had plenty of non-posted land, a generous trespass law and was right next door. MN used to be a duck hunting Mecca if you will. It was nationally known as the place to live for serious duck hunters. Now, it's depressing at best. </p><p></p><p>Unfortunately I don't have resident numbers for the same time frame because they are just included with general game licenses. You don't fill out any paperwork when you buy a waterfowl stamp. </p><p></p><p>I feel the sudden increase in hunters was generally just absorbed to begin with. Birds were still spread out. Not much land was posted. People were able to find abundant hunting opportunities without a lot of competition. </p><p></p><p>Then, things changed. First and foremost, ag practices. I once hypothesized that corn pushed the migration later because it was a higher energy food than small grains allowing the birds to stay later. I was right but for the wrong reasons. The answer is simpler in that the corn doesn't come down until November and the birds don't like to feed in it until it comes down. Simple enough. Since there is so much of it grown now for whatever reason (ethanol) there was a major change in the migration. Birds didn't space out from September to October anymore. They show up last week of October-first week of November and freeze up often happens a week later. Birds are pushed out right away. </p><p></p><p>In addition, big changes to ag practices in Canada. For whatever reason, they started growing more waterfowl friendly crops in the late 90's and I guess leave more waste in the fields. Thus the birds stay up there and we generally get the same weather they do. So when they get pushed out of Canada, they blow past North Dakota. </p><p></p><p>Finally, hunting practices. Hunting birds in field used to be considered low-brow. Now the entire thing has been stood on its head. Field hunting is all anyone wants to do. Hunting over water is now considered crude, to which I say "bullshit". You aren't going to shoot a redhead, canvasback, or any other diver in a field. Get off my back. Also, the huge increase in pressure resulted in a lot of land getting posted up. Hard to gain permission on a field sometimes when its 8 o'clock at night and you need to be in the field at 4 AM the next morning. For the uneducated in waterfowl behavior, they get highly concentrated. They aren't like pheasant where you can kick one or two out of every other clump of cover and bang out a limit. If you don't have the field, you aren't getting birds. </p><p></p><p>Some other interesting pieces of info. About 25% of sales are for NRs are statewide licenses. Most of the NRs make hunting trips of 3-5 days. Only about 20% make a second trip. Meaning 80% aren't using the second week they are allotted. </p><p></p><p>So what to do from here forward? It is important to me to have quality hunting for everyone involved. When we are stepping all over one another hunting increasingly clumped up birds, no one is happy. So first, I think we need to find a way to get hunters spread out more. The Devils Lake area should probably be its own zone with different regulations. </p><p></p><p>Generally I'm not anti NR. I like to hunt and fish out of state so I know the struggle of being a NR. But with that being said, big game tags aren't unlimited to NRs in other states. Some years, I have to go with out. Here too as a a resident. We may need to start treating waterfowl the same and put a cap on the numbers. 10-15,000 maybe. </p><p></p><p>I would ban ethanol with a flick of the wrist if I could but that won't happen.</p><p></p><p>So, I need ideas. Things need to change if waterfowl hunting is going to be any good here. My legislators are pretty approachable and I would like to pitch some ideas to them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Account Deleted, post: 125137, member: 886"] I've looked into some stats going back as far as the NDGF has records. Here is a snippet for the last 10 years or so of available data (from when I requested it, there is probably 2015 data available now). These are estimates. There is no 100% accurate way of tracking resident waterfowl hunters right now. Res. Non-Res. 2005 28,331 24,639 2006 26,560 22,277 2007 25,546 22,858 2008 24,001 18,485 2009 22,105 21,974 2010 22,664 23,624 2011 25,332 23,323 2012 25,789 23,756 2013 23,899 24,295 2014 23,606 24,252 As you can see, numbers are fairly stable. Some years there are more residents than nonresidents, some years not. You have to look back farther to see where the problem started (mid-90s). Starting in the mid-90s, there was an explosion of non-resident waterfowl hunters. In 1994 there was about 10,000 NR hunters. By 1999, there was 21,000. By 2001, there was 30,000. That was about the peak and there was a slight downturn and now a stabilization statistically speaking. The increase coincided with MN waterfowl hunting going to shit. Their water quality took a dump and so did the duck hunting. The migration shifted west and so did the duck hunters. ND had plenty of non-posted land, a generous trespass law and was right next door. MN used to be a duck hunting Mecca if you will. It was nationally known as the place to live for serious duck hunters. Now, it's depressing at best. Unfortunately I don't have resident numbers for the same time frame because they are just included with general game licenses. You don't fill out any paperwork when you buy a waterfowl stamp. I feel the sudden increase in hunters was generally just absorbed to begin with. Birds were still spread out. Not much land was posted. People were able to find abundant hunting opportunities without a lot of competition. Then, things changed. First and foremost, ag practices. I once hypothesized that corn pushed the migration later because it was a higher energy food than small grains allowing the birds to stay later. I was right but for the wrong reasons. The answer is simpler in that the corn doesn't come down until November and the birds don't like to feed in it until it comes down. Simple enough. Since there is so much of it grown now for whatever reason (ethanol) there was a major change in the migration. Birds didn't space out from September to October anymore. They show up last week of October-first week of November and freeze up often happens a week later. Birds are pushed out right away. In addition, big changes to ag practices in Canada. For whatever reason, they started growing more waterfowl friendly crops in the late 90's and I guess leave more waste in the fields. Thus the birds stay up there and we generally get the same weather they do. So when they get pushed out of Canada, they blow past North Dakota. Finally, hunting practices. Hunting birds in field used to be considered low-brow. Now the entire thing has been stood on its head. Field hunting is all anyone wants to do. Hunting over water is now considered crude, to which I say "bullshit". You aren't going to shoot a redhead, canvasback, or any other diver in a field. Get off my back. Also, the huge increase in pressure resulted in a lot of land getting posted up. Hard to gain permission on a field sometimes when its 8 o'clock at night and you need to be in the field at 4 AM the next morning. For the uneducated in waterfowl behavior, they get highly concentrated. They aren't like pheasant where you can kick one or two out of every other clump of cover and bang out a limit. If you don't have the field, you aren't getting birds. Some other interesting pieces of info. About 25% of sales are for NRs are statewide licenses. Most of the NRs make hunting trips of 3-5 days. Only about 20% make a second trip. Meaning 80% aren't using the second week they are allotted. So what to do from here forward? It is important to me to have quality hunting for everyone involved. When we are stepping all over one another hunting increasingly clumped up birds, no one is happy. So first, I think we need to find a way to get hunters spread out more. The Devils Lake area should probably be its own zone with different regulations. Generally I'm not anti NR. I like to hunt and fish out of state so I know the struggle of being a NR. But with that being said, big game tags aren't unlimited to NRs in other states. Some years, I have to go with out. Here too as a a resident. We may need to start treating waterfowl the same and put a cap on the numbers. 10-15,000 maybe. I would ban ethanol with a flick of the wrist if I could but that won't happen. So, I need ideas. Things need to change if waterfowl hunting is going to be any good here. My legislators are pretty approachable and I would like to pitch some ideas to them. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Representative Dockter
Latest: Allen
Today at 4:23 PM
H
Tailrace trout
Latest: honkerslayer
Today at 4:07 PM
Northern Lights
Latest: 5575
Today at 2:52 PM
This is what its all about
Latest: wslayer
Today at 12:22 PM
Merino Undies
Latest: wslayer
Today at 12:17 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: 5575
Today at 12:12 PM
Sale
Marlin 30TK
Latest: Zogman
Today at 8:20 AM
Velocitor V Stinger
Latest: SDMF
Today at 8:13 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 2:02 PM
SOLD
Elec Power Washer
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 1:26 PM
T
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 12:18 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:53 AM
No Mow May
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:24 AM
Tammy Miller
Latest: Trip McNeely
Thursday at 11:23 PM
Wild Turkey
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:26 PM
Best facebook page ever .
Latest: Davey Crockett
Thursday at 12:45 PM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Thursday at 11:28 AM
T
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 11:19 AM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Wednesday at 8:31 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
The Problem Facing ND Waterfowl Hunting
Top
Bottom