Whose has the better tasting walleye



shorthairsrus

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Posts
8,448
Likes
496
Points
393
what are you drinking? I fish right in the oil field pollution you speak of (and work 3 miles from the van hook boat ramp) and sak water is not more or less dirty now than it was when I was a kid and you clearly have not caught walleye in sak this year, average fish is 18-20" and a football... everyone I know that has been fishing in DL say they catch a lot of numbers but the 14" fish is about all they catch and its not as fat as a 14 from sak... IMO deeper, colder water fish always taste better, sak always has a current moving through it also *pssst it's still kind of a river*


Consistently -- the average tourney weights have been significantly larger on DL then Sak. The amount of fish over 25" is what does it. Sooner or later Sak will produce those huge bags - - when the forage starts running low and the water drops and them big boys get hungry.

- - - Updated - - -

girls vs boys
 

sweeney

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Posts
2,796
Likes
150
Points
323
Location
mandan
what are you drinking? I fish right in the oil field pollution you speak of (and work 3 miles from the van hook boat ramp) and sak water is not more or less dirty now than it was when I was a kid and you clearly have not caught walleye in sak this year, average fish is 18-20" and a football... everyone I know that has been fishing in DL say they catch a lot of numbers but the 14" fish is about all they catch and its not as fat as a 14 from sak... IMO deeper, colder water fish always taste better, sak always has a current moving through it also *pssst it's still kind of a river*

;:;banghead
200w.gif

200.gif


200.gif

200w.gif

200.gif


- - - Updated - - -

200w.gif


- - - Updated - - -

200.gif


- - - Updated - - -

200.gif
 

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,377
Likes
780
Points
483
Location
Drifting the high plains
I didn't read many of the posts, but have noticed a taste difference. People also often ask why the short fish are fat and the longer fish not so much. I think it's the Gammarus lacustrus they feed on that gives Devils Lake fish a poor taste. I notice the fish on the Jamestown reservoir taste much better. Also the problem with plumpness is energy budget. It's hard for a big fish to get fat on small food items. They spend as much energy getting them as they get out of them. They need a better minnow base.
 


Bfishn

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Posts
3,860
Likes
272
Points
333
The ND dept of health recommends eating half as many walleye from Devils as it does from Sak/Mo River if that tells ya anything.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,524
Likes
1,549
Points
638
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
The ND dept of health recommends eating half as many walleye from Devils as it does from Sak/Mo River if that tells ya anything.

Yeah, but you can use a 22" walleye out of DL as a thermometer. So they have that going for them.
 

shorthairsrus

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Posts
8,448
Likes
496
Points
393
The ND dept of health recommends eating half as many walleye from Devils as it does from Sak/Mo River if that tells ya anything.

Round steak is better for you than a ribeye. But which one would you rather have?

- - - Updated - - -

:;:howdy
 

Putz ND

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Posts
284
Likes
15
Points
125
Location
Devils Lake
Honestly, walleye are bland from both lakes. I love to fish, but can't really think of more over-rated table fare. Walleye fillets are just the delivery method for batter, breading, butter, spice with VERY little flavor of their own - what I enjoy most about a fish fry, is trying to rehydrate with blue num nums after a hot day of in the boat.
 


Captain Ahab

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2015
Posts
10,533
Likes
447
Points
428
Location
Timbuktu
For some reason the walleyes I catch on the Red in the fall are remarkably tasty. Most others taste about the same... but every fall I'll catch a 2 lb fish and we eat it and think "wow" after eating walleye all spring/summer from lakes.

Can't explain it.

I have also experienced this.
 

BBQBluesMan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2015
Posts
1,578
Likes
34
Points
231
Location
Da Upper
Honestly, walleye are bland from both lakes. I love to fish, but can't really think of more over-rated table fare. Walleye fillets are just the delivery method for batter, breading, butter, spice with VERY little flavor of their own - what I enjoy most about a fish fry, is trying to rehydrate with blue num nums after a hot day of in the boat.

Bingo!
 

guywhofishes

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Posts
28,735
Likes
4,144
Points
958
Location
Faaargo, ND
The ND dept of health recommends eating half as many walleye from Devils as it does from Sak/Mo River if that tells ya anything.

It tells me they need to update their guidance. It's the selenium/mercury balance that matters - not mercury alone.

Sloppy Google grade research suggests Devils Lake fish should be loaded with selenium goodness - neutralizing the mercury by binding too it or chelating it somehow and allowing it to flush out of your system rather than cause trouble. Not sure of the details but it's a thing.

panel-2h-ralston.jpg
 


Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,524
Likes
1,549
Points
638
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
It tells me they need to update their guidance. It's the selenium/mercury balance that matters - not mercury alone.

Sloppy Google grade research suggests Devils Lake fish should be loaded with selenium goodness - neutralizing the mercury by binding too it or chelating it somehow and allowing it to flush out of your system rather than cause trouble. Not sure of the details but it's a thing.

kikipasso_29401224_442501322853255_3043263463435534336_n.jpg


Both the selenium and mercury are coming out of either the Pierre or Niobrara shale which has outcrops in the area. This is also responsible for a lot of the arsenic although I don't remember offhand which formation contributes more to DL. The groundwater in eastern ND is often found in aquifers loaded with shale fragments (sand to gravel sized) that can be mobilized via denitrification. At least, that's my theory. The organic portions of the shale tend to hold a lot of trace elements like mercury and selenium, whereas the inorganic (pyrite) holds the most arsenic. Oxidizing the organic carbon or pyrite frees it up and lets it become more mobile.

- - - Updated - - -

FWIW, I think the ducks out near Kelly's Slough have had several studies done on them for mercury.
 

LBrandt

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2016
Posts
10,867
Likes
1,459
Points
508
Location
SE ND
Red River fish weigh more because they are plumb full of mercury. JMO.
 

Sum1

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Posts
4,819
Likes
297
Points
323
Location
Bismarck
Every walleye I have ever eaten has tasted the same. Cold clear water or warm scummy water, doesn't matter have never noticed a difference. Don't sweat the small stuff.

If Hilary were to cook some walleye I imagine they would be pretty shitty tasting.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 26
  • This month: 22
  • This month: 15
  • This month: 11
  • This month: 10
  • This month: 9
  • This month: 8
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 6
Top Bottom