What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
250 LBS of Week - Not Guilty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleted member" data-source="post: 229212" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>stopping based on profile is not legal. stopping based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause is. in this case, he had PC to make the stop. this is from memory as it was a couple of weeks ago i read the briefs and decision. but, they were speeding i believe. problem is he detained them well past what would have been acceptable for a speeding ticket. the judge ruled the other circumstances the officer described did not warrant the continued detention and questioning in the police vehicle. nor did it warrant the k9 sniff. and he also said the alert of the dog wasn't enough to be considered an actual alert. that part of the decision was a bit sketchy to me. but, i think it was kind of irrelevant once he ruled the initial detention went on way too long in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleted member, post: 229212, member: 816"] stopping based on profile is not legal. stopping based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause is. in this case, he had PC to make the stop. this is from memory as it was a couple of weeks ago i read the briefs and decision. but, they were speeding i believe. problem is he detained them well past what would have been acceptable for a speeding ticket. the judge ruled the other circumstances the officer described did not warrant the continued detention and questioning in the police vehicle. nor did it warrant the k9 sniff. and he also said the alert of the dog wasn't enough to be considered an actual alert. that part of the decision was a bit sketchy to me. but, i think it was kind of irrelevant once he ruled the initial detention went on way too long in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
F
ND bighorn sheep lottery
Latest: Flannel
10 minutes ago
Morels
Latest: guywhofishes
16 minutes ago
Garden!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Latest: lunkerslayer
22 minutes ago
Twins
Latest: wslayer
40 minutes ago
Fargo PD
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 7:52 AM
POS
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 7:39 AM
Sale
Remington 788 222
Latest: shorthairsrus
Today at 7:31 AM
Spring has sprung-
Latest: ndfinfan
Today at 6:19 AM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 11:27 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 9:04 PM
F
Missouri River Bismarck area
Latest: fly2cast
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
Little heart well pipe.
Latest: Achucker
Yesterday at 1:04 PM
Oahe 26
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 10:58 AM
Predictions for deer season 26
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 7:31 AM
Gm
Latest: NDSportsman
Yesterday at 7:20 AM
Accuracy Oil YT
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 7:49 PM
M
Contemplating a shop build
Latest: Mike Fretty
Wednesday at 5:43 PM
S
2007 Yukon headrest
Latest: scrotcaster
Wednesday at 3:13 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Big Iron
Wednesday at 10:18 AM
S
Retardation (turkey shells) YT
Latest: snow2
Tuesday at 8:41 PM
Ice Fishing
Latest: bowcarp
Tuesday at 5:59 PM
Boat carpet
Latest: Slappy
Tuesday at 5:44 PM
Sucker Minnows
Latest: Lycanthrope
Tuesday at 11:15 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
250 LBS of Week - Not Guilty
Top
Bottom