What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
250 LBS of Week - Not Guilty
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deleted member" data-source="post: 229212" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>stopping based on profile is not legal. stopping based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause is. in this case, he had PC to make the stop. this is from memory as it was a couple of weeks ago i read the briefs and decision. but, they were speeding i believe. problem is he detained them well past what would have been acceptable for a speeding ticket. the judge ruled the other circumstances the officer described did not warrant the continued detention and questioning in the police vehicle. nor did it warrant the k9 sniff. and he also said the alert of the dog wasn't enough to be considered an actual alert. that part of the decision was a bit sketchy to me. but, i think it was kind of irrelevant once he ruled the initial detention went on way too long in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deleted member, post: 229212, member: 816"] stopping based on profile is not legal. stopping based on reasonable suspicion or probable cause is. in this case, he had PC to make the stop. this is from memory as it was a couple of weeks ago i read the briefs and decision. but, they were speeding i believe. problem is he detained them well past what would have been acceptable for a speeding ticket. the judge ruled the other circumstances the officer described did not warrant the continued detention and questioning in the police vehicle. nor did it warrant the k9 sniff. and he also said the alert of the dog wasn't enough to be considered an actual alert. that part of the decision was a bit sketchy to me. but, i think it was kind of irrelevant once he ruled the initial detention went on way too long in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
G
Cheaper Lithium for FFS shuttl
Latest: GSM
Yesterday at 10:30 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: KDM
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
N
Polaris Ranger Windshield?
Latest: NDbowman
Yesterday at 9:02 PM
C
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: camper
Yesterday at 6:56 PM
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 5:15 PM
Wood Planer?
Latest: risingsun
Yesterday at 1:51 PM
N
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: NodakBob
Yesterday at 9:35 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: guywhofishes
Yesterday at 8:20 AM
Tire inflator
Latest: ndfinfan
Yesterday at 7:18 AM
F 150 Owners
Latest: 1lessdog
Yesterday at 5:55 AM
M
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Migrator Man
Saturday at 9:30 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Rut2much
Saturday at 10:21 AM
SnowDog
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 7:16 AM
Eat steak wear real fur
Latest: lunkerslayer
Saturday at 6:54 AM
P
Anyone see that one coming
Latest: PrairieGhost
Saturday at 6:42 AM
Rods From god YT
Latest: svnmag
Saturday at 1:36 AM
N
Heated jackets
Latest: ndrivrrat
Friday at 5:07 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Friday at 4:54 PM
Harwood ND AI business
Latest: Davy Crockett
Friday at 3:58 PM
B
Ice fishing Sak
Latest: Bcblazek
Friday at 3:05 PM
Packers
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 11:43 PM
Montana Snowpack
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:45 PM
Bud Heavy
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 8:20 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
250 LBS of Week - Not Guilty
Top
Bottom