Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Allen" data-source="post: 358352" data-attributes="member: 389">&quot;Molberg’s findings and theories are by no means an open and shut case. One of the problems is the 500 foot differential in elevation between the Glacial Lake Souris level and the level of the spillway into the Sheyenne River. He had an explanation for this too. Based on Charles Hapgood’s theory of a shift in the earth’s crust, is it possible, that this had caused a change in the elevation of the Turtle Mountains in the last 600 years? We know that earth is not a solid mass, as was supposed a few hundred years ago.&nbsp; It’s a turbulent planet, full of life. The ocean floors are constantly shifting and earthquakes occurring.&quot;Since a 500 foot rise in the elevation of north central ND would create untold chaos on the land and leave geologic evidence of such an upheaval, I think it's safe to say it never happened. The above snippet would suggest that for these to truly be Viking mooring stones, the Vikings would have had to be in the area roughly 6,000 BC.&nbsp; Does that sound reasonable?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Allen, post: 358352, member: 389"] [I]"Molberg’s findings and theories are by no means an open and shut case. One of the problems is the 500 foot differential in elevation between the Glacial Lake Souris level and the level of the spillway into the Sheyenne River. He had an explanation for this too. Based on Charles Hapgood’s theory of a shift in the earth’s crust, is it possible, that this had caused a change in the elevation of the Turtle Mountains in the last 600 years? We know that earth is not a solid mass, as was supposed a few hundred years ago. It’s a turbulent planet, full of life. The ocean floors are constantly shifting and earthquakes occurring."[/I] Since a 500 foot rise in the elevation of north central ND would create untold chaos on the land and leave geologic evidence of such an upheaval, I think it's safe to say it never happened. The above snippet would suggest that for these to truly be Viking mooring stones, the Vikings would have had to be in the area roughly 6,000 BC. Does that sound reasonable? [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA