Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fritz the Cat" data-source="post: 358020" data-attributes="member: 605">My position has not changed. Have always said some money for research. No money for management and surveillance. Why? Because if the above web-links are the template or recipe how State and federal agencies are going to waste taxpayer money who can support that? The ND game and Fish wrote and received a grant for this below:Shifting behaviors to lower the risk of CWD; a multi-media approach North Dakota Game and Fish Department $96,300.00They had three meetings around the State and handed out much printed material or propaganda. They are spending taxpayer money to influence the public's perception of baiting. An embedded message. My position:Generations ago smut completely wiped out the barley crop. 100%. An individual was walking through a brown landscape of dead barley. He found one healthy golden ripe barley head standing out there. He found a smut resistant plant, picked the kernels and now most barley has been cross bred back to it.The same can be done with deer. Place 100 in a pen. If 99 die of CWD..........what about that one which is 9 years old and never got sick living in a heavily infected area? Maybe the answer is in the genomes. Please watch the video below. [MEDIA=youtube]hgviQ7YJ_T0[/MEDIA]Research is the answer. Millions for surveillance, monitoring and figuring out how to keep deer six feet apart is not.  One last thing, sportsmen should be angry the NDGF is spending money on human dimensions or how to change your thinking.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA