Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SDMF" data-source="post: 415048" data-attributes="member: 412">Unless you go back to purely patched round-balls, you can't get away from ML's being a 200yd + weapon with a good aperture sight, some load work-up with conicals, and a bit of practice.It doesn't matter if it's got a hammer or inline ignition.&nbsp; I haven't looked, but, I bet I can find a pretty pointy hard-cast lead projectile.&nbsp; For a bit of $$ I bet Accuracy Innovations or Woox would make me a very stable stock/chassis.&nbsp; They'd probably even integrate a Vernier tang-sight mount to lengthen my sighting plane and give me way more vertical adjustment.Move to external hammers only and you can bet it wouldn't take a good machinist long to make an off-set hammer and ignition chamber for a current in-line rifle.I came up with that in about 3min worth of thinking.&nbsp; Imagine what a smart person with machining skills could do between now and ML season.......</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SDMF, post: 415048, member: 412"] Unless you go back to purely patched round-balls, you can't get away from ML's being a 200yd + weapon with a good aperture sight, some load work-up with conicals, and a bit of practice. It doesn't matter if it's got a hammer or inline ignition. I haven't looked, but, I bet I can find a pretty pointy hard-cast lead projectile. For a bit of $$ I bet Accuracy Innovations or Woox would make me a very stable stock/chassis. They'd probably even integrate a Vernier tang-sight mount to lengthen my sighting plane and give me way more vertical adjustment. Move to external hammers only and you can bet it wouldn't take a good machinist long to make an off-set hammer and ignition chamber for a current in-line rifle. I came up with that in about 3min worth of thinking. Imagine what a smart person with machining skills could do between now and ML season....... [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA