Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="pluckem" data-source="post: 181409" data-attributes="member: 843">That would be false.  Almost the opposite. You need to separate out the vibration killing function of some stabilizers with that of actually stabilizing your bow/shot sequence. They are two different things.There is a better argument that any stabilizer less than 6" will offer little stabilization benefits. unless you are adding over a pound of weight. Sometimes the trade off is worth it. If I am high country mule deer hunting or something like that I might look at setting up my bow with a short stabilizer that only focuses on vibration dampening and practicing with the bow that way.  It would eliminate 10-16oz on my bow. However, my comfortable range might be shortened up some if practice shows opened up groups.- - - Updated - - -Exactly, every bow and archer will be different as to what it takes to get to the best set up. This is where just throwing a 8" bar with 8oz of weight on the end of it might do you no good, make it worse depending on the balance of the bow, or it could be the optimum thing to do.  You want your stabilizer set up, front bar and back bar, to balance your bow while also increasing the bows moment of inertia and pushing the center of gravity lower on the bow. All of this will reduce your pin float and, all other things equal, tighten up your groups(consistency). Its a balancing thing though and like most things improving one aspect might hurt something else....</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA