Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Trip McNeely" data-source="post: 74913" data-attributes="member: 728">shaziers intent was to make a tackle. did helmets contact? yeah they probably did but it was non-malscious contact that is part of football. when a player has time to make a football move they more often than not drop there head to absorb impact. the refs saw the same thing I did and deemed shaziers hit and any helmet contact to be incidental and not an act of maliscous intent, but a result of an offensive player making a move and a defenseive player making a tackle, making it more of a judgement call for the refs.burficts hit was a completely obvious attempt to injure a player. he aimed his helmet at the helmet of another player who had not completed a football move. brown was still in the air for christs sake! it wasn't even debatable what his intent was going in high like that. if he was trying to make a clean hit he would have went at the mid-section of brown instead.its hard to separate intent sometimes between a player just playing a rough injury prone game and a guy trying to take a cheap shot but when a player like burfict was out of control all game and causing a headache for the refs numerous times with his scuffles he was asking to be put in a microscope all game. then to make a play like that at the end how do you not think they wont call that? its not the refs fault, its not the stealers fault. most of the fault lies on the player but a lot lies on marvin lewis for not diffusing the situation earlier. he is the manager of the game and his men. there is a reason Burfict didn't get drafted in the 1st round. he had 1st round talent going into the draft but 31 other teams passed on him. wonder why?</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA