Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 67115" data-attributes="member: 373">Sooooooo then as school in their &quot;struggle&quot; decides it is &quot;appropriate&quot; for a boy who is gender confused to use the girls locker room decides it is &quot;appropriate&quot; for this boy to submit a senior pic of him dressed in a stunning evening gown that is acceptable but this is not ? How about if the Federal govt tells them is has to be &quot;appropriate&quot;? Just curious where everyone draws their lines. But I did notice your usage of the &quot;Murican&quot;&nbsp; descriptor in your first post that is common in progressive dialogue where it is used as a derogatory term for those with differing values than those using it that they do not &quot;tolerate&quot;. So if this was a fella in a dress holding a rainbow flag and his two Dads and the ACLU were filing a lawsuit to force this pic to be published, is that a case of &quot;just a fervent contrarian mentality to &quot;stick it to the conservatives.&quot;? Or is it viewed by society now as sticking up for ones Constitutional rights? Just wondering what is acceptable in &quot;Murica&quot; anymore. I mean under the 1st amendment we can chant &quot;death to cops&quot; but if we insert Muslim in for cops we will be prosecuted by the highest legal authority in the land. So what would be the response if this fella was in a National Guard uniform instead of his &quot;wife beater&quot; holding an AR 15 in front of the flag? Would the people calling for it to be banned be any different? If the school board has set policy hey fine, just make sure that policy includes everything anyone can find offensive. And one by one we fall in line or be ostracized in society&nbsp;......it is easy comrade.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 67115, member: 373"] Sooooooo then as school in their "struggle" decides it is "appropriate" for a boy who is gender confused to use the girls locker room decides it is "appropriate" for this boy to submit a senior pic of him dressed in a stunning evening gown that is acceptable but this is not ? How about if the Federal govt tells them is has to be "appropriate"? Just curious where everyone draws their lines. But I did notice your usage of the "Murican" descriptor in your first post that is common in progressive dialogue where it is used as a derogatory term for those with differing values than those using it that they do not "tolerate". So if this was a fella in a dress holding a rainbow flag and his two Dads and the ACLU were filing a lawsuit to force this pic to be published, is that a case of "just a fervent contrarian mentality to "stick it to the conservatives."? Or is it viewed by society now as sticking up for ones Constitutional rights? Just wondering what is acceptable in "Murica" anymore. I mean under the 1st amendment we can chant "death to cops" but if we insert Muslim in for cops we will be prosecuted by the highest legal authority in the land. So what would be the response if this fella was in a National Guard uniform instead of his "wife beater" holding an AR 15 in front of the flag? Would the people calling for it to be banned be any different? If the school board has set policy hey fine, just make sure that policy includes everything anyone can find offensive. And one by one we fall in line or be ostracized in society ......it is easy comrade. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA