Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 54415" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>Last time I checked, it took TWO people to make a baby.&nbsp; The responsibility is shared so when they CHOSE to have a child they gave up their time to party and go out.&nbsp; The custodial parent most of the time fought to keep the child.&nbsp; So they fought for and asked to give up their time and opportunity to party so I don't buy your argument about the time issue.&nbsp; Additionally, most non custodial parents would prefer to have their child with them.&nbsp; I know I did and I went all the way to the Supreme Court of ND to keep my child at least close enough so I could see him.&nbsp; However, as often happens, the custodial parent was allowed to take the child a long distance away taking much of the opportunity for interaction with the child by the non custodial parent away or making it very difficult.&nbsp; So you see, it isn't a matter of MANNING UP AND TAKING CARE OF THEM.&nbsp; It's a matter of having a system totally remove a non custodial parents opportunity to be involved with their child, financially, emotionally, physically, and spiritually.&nbsp; So if you don't mind you can stick your &quot;MAN UP..&quot; comment where the sun don't shine.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="KDM, post: 54415, member: 314"] Last time I checked, it took TWO people to make a baby. The responsibility is shared so when they CHOSE to have a child they gave up their time to party and go out. The custodial parent most of the time fought to keep the child. So they fought for and asked to give up their time and opportunity to party so I don't buy your argument about the time issue. Additionally, most non custodial parents would prefer to have their child with them. I know I did and I went all the way to the Supreme Court of ND to keep my child at least close enough so I could see him. However, as often happens, the custodial parent was allowed to take the child a long distance away taking much of the opportunity for interaction with the child by the non custodial parent away or making it very difficult. So you see, it isn't a matter of MANNING UP AND TAKING CARE OF THEM. It's a matter of having a system totally remove a non custodial parents opportunity to be involved with their child, financially, emotionally, physically, and spiritually. So if you don't mind you can stick your "MAN UP.." comment where the sun don't shine. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA