Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Marbleyes" data-source="post: 297124" data-attributes="member: 675">You apparently didn’t read the post I was responding to, which was this:  “Question, do the Coal power plants get Subsidies or have they ever got Subsidies?“Where did I say anything about wind subsidies? Where did he even ask about wind subsidies? I guess somehow in your world when I responded by saying YES coal plants receive subsidies and YES they have in the past as well, somehow means I’m talking about wind subsidies and comparing that to coal? Yet, oddly enough you state above that coal gets subsidized 10% of what wind gets. So your answer to AR-15’s question was essentially yes coal gets subsidized. Yes, I know one of the links talked about SUBSIDIZING expensive “clean technologies” and yes, I know it was because of shit obama mandated but that’s not the question AR-15 asked. I’m assuming he can read and understand the articles I posted, which all stated, (as you did above) that YES coal gets and has gotten subsidies just like ALL renewable and non renewable energy has. I’m guessing you’re the one who gave me the unsigned negative rep. Unfortunately, I’m not the sensitive type so negative reps on the internet do nothing for me, although I did get a little chuckle out of it considering I royally pissed someone off by using the word yes twice, along with 3 articles for reference about coal subsidies.- - - Updated - - -I understand what you’re saying Obi. I just went by the literal definition of subsidy to answer AR-15’s question and posted a few articles for reference. I had to weed through a shit ton of “green/renewable” sourced articles to find a couple that weren’t written with such a left leaning agenda. Here I thought I was simply answering a simple question that AR-15 asked. Turns out I triggered v193 in the process.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA