What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Constitutional carry oops
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bed Wetter" data-source="post: 179751" data-attributes="member: 428"><p>Prior to the last legislative session, NDCC was poorly worded and indicated that NO ONE could carry a loaded firearm. If anyone were actually charged, the court would go back to legislative testimony and committee hearing reports to determine the intent of the law. They don't rely solely on the text of NDCC. Prosecution for having a loaded weapon in a vehicle could likely be overturned based on legislative intent, but I wouldn't want to be the guinea pig.</p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p>I just thought of something else: two sessions ago they changed the legal definition of "loaded"'to indicate that a round needs to be in the chamber. This means you CAN have a full mag in a semi-auto pistol but can't have one in the chamber. NEVER TRUST THE MEDIA TO EXPLAIN THE LAW.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bed Wetter, post: 179751, member: 428"] Prior to the last legislative session, NDCC was poorly worded and indicated that NO ONE could carry a loaded firearm. If anyone were actually charged, the court would go back to legislative testimony and committee hearing reports to determine the intent of the law. They don't rely solely on the text of NDCC. Prosecution for having a loaded weapon in a vehicle could likely be overturned based on legislative intent, but I wouldn't want to be the guinea pig. [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] I just thought of something else: two sessions ago they changed the legal definition of "loaded"'to indicate that a round needs to be in the chamber. This means you CAN have a full mag in a semi-auto pistol but can't have one in the chamber. NEVER TRUST THE MEDIA TO EXPLAIN THE LAW. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: NDSportsman
8 minutes ago
R
Wood Stoves
Latest: riverview
38 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: wslayer
43 minutes ago
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Lycanthrope
Today at 12:46 PM
Health Care Cost
Latest: Obi-Wan
Today at 10:12 AM
Western ND river ice
Latest: Jiffy
Today at 8:00 AM
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: 1bigfokker
Today at 12:12 AM
Hobby
Latest: grantfurness
Yesterday at 11:54 PM
Concealed carry
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
Customer service
Latest: jr2280
Yesterday at 10:17 PM
Catfish anyone?
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:15 PM
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 5:04 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 4:47 PM
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Yesterday at 3:28 PM
T
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 2:12 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Yesterday at 6:25 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Thursday at 3:24 PM
ND concealed Weapons Permit
Latest: Maddog
Wednesday at 6:45 PM
Heated jackets
Latest: wslayer
Wednesday at 4:36 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Constitutional carry oops
Top
Bottom