Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Davy Crockett" data-source="post: 360974" data-attributes="member: 367">Despite the spite, there are&nbsp; some lessons to be learned here &nbsp; According to the criminal complaint filed against him, Wolf had received permission to hunt on the harvested bean field from an authorized agent for the landowner, but was told not to hunt near the property line unless also given permission by Erman.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; At first I thought this boils down to the interpretation the word &quot;near&quot;&nbsp; but In the plea bargain the word &quot;on&quot;&nbsp; the property automatically cancels out the word near.&nbsp; USDA has good maps and it's pretty easy to overlay a USDA map with a clear plastic see through grid and provided solid proof that the hunting blind was on mad mans property. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I had not determined with certainty that I was not on that patch of land; It turned out that I was on that patch of land.”&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Doesn't matter if you want to build a house, plant a tree, build a fence or set up a duck blind, there are property line law to obey and that's for our own good.&nbsp; &nbsp; We are lucky that a judge is bound by laws just as we are pertaining to a property lines with little to no exceptions.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I'm not knit picking or sticking up for either party ,&nbsp; this whole scenario is total bullshit and it gives hunters and landowners alike a black eye,&nbsp; speaking as a land owner and hunter ,&nbsp;&nbsp; If someone gives us permission to hunt in a certain&nbsp; area but specifically states not to go &quot;near&quot; a property line it's in our best interest obey that request in a gracious manner.It will be interesting to see how&nbsp; Jeff the mad mans outcome will be for trading in special influence, disorderly conduct and interference with rights of hunters.&nbsp; &nbsp; There is lots of grey area in that but not so much about property lines.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Davy Crockett, post: 360974, member: 367"] Despite the spite, there are some lessons to be learned here [B] According to the criminal complaint filed against him, Wolf had received permission to hunt on the harvested bean field from an authorized agent for the landowner, but was told not to hunt near the property line unless also given permission by Erman.[/B] At first I thought this boils down to the interpretation the word "near" but In the plea bargain the word "on" the property automatically cancels out the word near. USDA has good maps and it's pretty easy to overlay a USDA map with a clear plastic see through grid and provided solid proof that the hunting blind was on mad mans property. [B] I had not determined with certainty that I was not on that patch of land; It turned out that I was on that patch of land.” [/B] Doesn't matter if you want to build a house, plant a tree, build a fence or set up a duck blind, there are property line law to obey and that's for our own good. We are lucky that a judge is bound by laws just as we are pertaining to a property lines with little to no exceptions. I'm not knit picking or sticking up for either party , this whole scenario is total bullshit and it gives hunters and landowners alike a black eye, speaking as a land owner and hunter , If someone gives us permission to hunt in a certain area but specifically states not to go "near" a property line it's in our best interest obey that request in a gracious manner. It will be interesting to see how Jeff the mad mans outcome will be for trading in special influence, disorderly conduct and interference with rights of hunters. There is lots of grey area in that but not so much about property lines. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA