What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
ESA and WOLVES
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 226829" data-attributes="member: 337"><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">I’m responding to Brenda Peterson’s July 25 letter where she objected to the proposal to delist the gray wolf from the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act. The ESA was enacted in 1973 to not only protect imperiled species from extinction, but also to promote the recovery of those species to population levels that would eventually preclude further protection and thus allow for delisting.</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">Science-based management plans, developed by a team of wildlife experts, established measurable recovery goals for the Western Great Lakes population of gray wolves, the population which Peterson may have been referring to. Those management plans have allowed that distinct population of gray wolves to expand their numbers to levels that far exceed the original recovery goals. Thus, delisting of that population is warranted and should be viewed as an ESA success story.</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">Peterson argues that delisting should not be undertaken because so much of the gray wolf’s historic range is devoid of wolves. What she fails to acknowledge is those areas are dominated by humans and human-induced landscape changes that include intensive agriculture and urbanization. Those historic ranges are not suitable habitat for wolves; however, the current range of the gray wolf provides the habitat that has allowed that population to exceed the ESA recovery goals.</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #CCCCCC"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></span></span></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #CCCCCC"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></p></p> <p style="text-align: left"></span></span></p></span></span></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #CCCCCC"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p></span></span></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #CCCCCC"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p></span></span></p><p style="text-align: left"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #CCCCCC"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></span></p></p> <p style="text-align: center"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"><span style="color: #444444"><span style="font-family: 'Yrsa'">Wolves are an iconic and charismatic species, similar to the bald eagle, which was removed from ESA protection in 2007 after the population exceeded its recovery goals. When science and not emotion is used to develop management plans species, like the gray wolf, can and should be delisted from the ESA protections.</span></span></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Lato'"></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: silver"><span style="font-size: 9px">- - - Updated - - -</span></span></p><p></p><p><strong>Phil Mastrangelo, Mandan</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 226829, member: 337"] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]I’m responding to Brenda Peterson’s July 25 letter where she objected to the proposal to delist the gray wolf from the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act. The ESA was enacted in 1973 to not only protect imperiled species from extinction, but also to promote the recovery of those species to population levels that would eventually preclude further protection and thus allow for delisting.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]Science-based management plans, developed by a team of wildlife experts, established measurable recovery goals for the Western Great Lakes population of gray wolves, the population which Peterson may have been referring to. Those management plans have allowed that distinct population of gray wolves to expand their numbers to levels that far exceed the original recovery goals. Thus, delisting of that population is warranted and should be viewed as an ESA success story.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/COLOR] [CENTER][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato] [/FONT][/COLOR][/CENTER] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]Peterson argues that delisting should not be undertaken because so much of the gray wolf’s historic range is devoid of wolves. What she fails to acknowledge is those areas are dominated by humans and human-induced landscape changes that include intensive agriculture and urbanization. Those historic ranges are not suitable habitat for wolves; however, the current range of the gray wolf provides the habitat that has allowed that population to exceed the ESA recovery goals.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/COLOR] [CENTER][COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][LEFT][COLOR=#CCCCCC][FONT=Arial] [CENTER][/CENTER] [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT] [/FONT][/COLOR][/CENTER] [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Lato][COLOR=#444444][FONT=Yrsa]Wolves are an iconic and charismatic species, similar to the bald eagle, which was removed from ESA protection in 2007 after the population exceeded its recovery goals. When science and not emotion is used to develop management plans species, like the gray wolf, can and should be delisted from the ESA protections.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR="silver"][SIZE=1]- - - Updated - - -[/SIZE][/COLOR] [B]Phil Mastrangelo, Mandan[/B] [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
T
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Tymurrey
12 minutes ago
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Maddog
Today at 6:34 AM
S
Satellite Internet
Latest: sdietrich
Yesterday at 10:34 PM
T
Let's talk EBIKES!!!
Latest: Traxion
Yesterday at 8:56 PM
Which one you did this?
Latest: bucksnbears
Yesterday at 8:29 PM
L
Hard decision -Dog
Latest: LBrandt
Yesterday at 5:29 PM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: tdismydog
Yesterday at 3:15 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 2:52 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 11:53 AM
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: Wirehair
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Health insurance
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 12:18 AM
T
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: Tikka280ai
Wednesday at 8:33 PM
A
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: AR-15
Wednesday at 4:47 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Wednesday at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Wednesday at 9:53 AM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Zogman
Wednesday at 7:21 AM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Tuesday at 7:22 PM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Rowdie
Tuesday at 12:58 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: johnr
Tuesday at 9:49 AM
S
BISON
Latest: savage270
Tuesday at 8:34 AM
Yoga
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 11:34 PM
What happened to "htat was me"
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 3:51 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
ESA and WOLVES
Top
Bottom