What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 106047" data-attributes="member: 373"><p>I know I should likely just pass this by....</p><p></p><p>plainsman, this is a bit of advice. The reason you have no one posting on the site you moderate is because of years of this kind of crap. </p><p></p><p>You slap paint around like a little kid painting a fence for the first time that gets more on himself than he does the fence then you get mad and ban those that point that out and try to tell you what might work a little better. </p><p></p><p><strong>I know MANY people on the "right" that support public lands, myself included</strong>. We understand the need to keep some lands open to all to use. Even to the point of leaving some undeveloped. But we have seen firsthand the mismanagemnent and inefficiencies of the Federal govt in managing these lands mostly becasue they have people that beleive becasue they have been "trained" and have a degree with a few letters behind their name they know better than anyone else. You have shared that way of thinking yourself on these sites as an ex govt employee/biologist.</p><p></p><p>We have seen a slow gradual replacement of people within govt that worked with people that are out on these lands that are now replaced with people with ideologies like yourself. It is what is pushing that pendelum. </p><p></p><p>So why try to demonize entire groups of people like you do? What do you hope to gain? Most people know better. </p><p></p><p><strong>Yet once again plainsman here is your "sagebrush rebellion" you post about all the time. Tell us where this group wants to take public lands away like you constantly accuse.<span style="font-size: 18px"> Tell us exactly what ideals they hold that is wrong?</span> </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/get_the_facts" target="_blank">http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/get_the_facts</a></p><p></p><p><strong>ALC Public Policy Statement:</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #060C05"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><strong>One of the best resources for clearing up any misinformation is the American Lands Council Policy Statement. The American Lands Council public policy statement in regards to the Transfer of Public Lands was drafted and ratified by over 100 leaders from 14 states as well as the American Lands Council Board of Directors. The policy statement covers the basics of what we believe and what goals we hope to achieve.</strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #5D5D5D"><span style="font-family: 'PT Sans'"><strong>1. WE URGE THE TIMELY AND ORDERLY TRANSFER OF FEDERAL PUBLIC LANDS TO WILLING STATES FOR LOCAL CONTROL THAT WILL PROVIDE BETTER PUBLIC ACCESS, BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, AND BETTER ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY; </strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #5D5D5D"><span style="font-family: 'PT Sans'"><strong>2. WE SUPPORT EXCLUDING EXISTING NATIONAL PARKS, CONGRESSIONALLY DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS, INDIAN RESERVATIONS, AND MILITARY INSTALLATIONS FROM THE TRANSFER; AND </strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #5D5D5D"><span style="font-family: 'PT Sans'"><strong>3. WE SUPPORT EQUIPPING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL AGENCIES WITH RESOURCES NECESSARY TO PLAN FOR A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO STATE-BASED OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT OF THE TRANSFERRED PUBLIC LANDS; AND </strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #5D5D5D"><span style="font-family: 'PT Sans'"><strong>4. WE URGE MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES FOR THESE LANDS THAT WILL: IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESS; IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; IMPROVE ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY; RETAIN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC LANDS; IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF WILDFIRE CONTROL; INCREASE LOCAL INVOLVEMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY; PROTECT USE RIGHTS; PRESERVE CUSTOMS & CULTURE; INCORPORATE FEDERAL AGENCY EXPERTISE; GENERATE SELF-SUPPORTING FINANCE.</strong></span></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><a href="http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/" target="_blank">http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>You might try to learn something from the fable about the little boy that cried wolf palinsman.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gst, post: 106047, member: 373"] I know I should likely just pass this by.... plainsman, this is a bit of advice. The reason you have no one posting on the site you moderate is because of years of this kind of crap. You slap paint around like a little kid painting a fence for the first time that gets more on himself than he does the fence then you get mad and ban those that point that out and try to tell you what might work a little better. [B]I know MANY people on the "right" that support public lands, myself included[/B]. We understand the need to keep some lands open to all to use. Even to the point of leaving some undeveloped. But we have seen firsthand the mismanagemnent and inefficiencies of the Federal govt in managing these lands mostly becasue they have people that beleive becasue they have been "trained" and have a degree with a few letters behind their name they know better than anyone else. You have shared that way of thinking yourself on these sites as an ex govt employee/biologist. We have seen a slow gradual replacement of people within govt that worked with people that are out on these lands that are now replaced with people with ideologies like yourself. It is what is pushing that pendelum. So why try to demonize entire groups of people like you do? What do you hope to gain? Most people know better. [B]Yet once again plainsman here is your "sagebrush rebellion" you post about all the time. Tell us where this group wants to take public lands away like you constantly accuse.[SIZE=5] Tell us exactly what ideals they hold that is wrong?[/SIZE] [/B] [URL]http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/get_the_facts[/URL] [B]ALC Public Policy Statement:[/B] [SIZE=4][COLOR=#060C05][FONT=Arial][B]One of the best resources for clearing up any misinformation is the American Lands Council Policy Statement. The American Lands Council public policy statement in regards to the Transfer of Public Lands was drafted and ratified by over 100 leaders from 14 states as well as the American Lands Council Board of Directors. The policy statement covers the basics of what we believe and what goals we hope to achieve.[/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5D5D5D][FONT=PT Sans][B]1. WE URGE THE TIMELY AND ORDERLY TRANSFER OF FEDERAL PUBLIC LANDS TO WILLING STATES FOR LOCAL CONTROL THAT WILL PROVIDE BETTER PUBLIC ACCESS, BETTER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, AND BETTER ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY; [/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5D5D5D][FONT=PT Sans][B]2. WE SUPPORT EXCLUDING EXISTING NATIONAL PARKS, CONGRESSIONALLY DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS, INDIAN RESERVATIONS, AND MILITARY INSTALLATIONS FROM THE TRANSFER; AND [/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5D5D5D][FONT=PT Sans][B]3. WE SUPPORT EQUIPPING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL AGENCIES WITH RESOURCES NECESSARY TO PLAN FOR A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO STATE-BASED OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT OF THE TRANSFERRED PUBLIC LANDS; AND [/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=#5D5D5D][FONT=PT Sans][B]4. WE URGE MANAGEMENT PRIORITIES FOR THESE LANDS THAT WILL: IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCESS; IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; IMPROVE ECONOMIC PRODUCTIVITY; RETAIN PUBLIC OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC LANDS; IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF WILDFIRE CONTROL; INCREASE LOCAL INVOLVEMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY; PROTECT USE RIGHTS; PRESERVE CUSTOMS & CULTURE; INCORPORATE FEDERAL AGENCY EXPERTISE; GENERATE SELF-SUPPORTING FINANCE.[/B][/FONT][/COLOR] [/SIZE] [URL]http://www.americanlandscouncil.org/[/URL] You might try to learn something from the fable about the little boy that cried wolf palinsman. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
C
Representative Dockter
Latest: camper
10 minutes ago
Northern Lights
Latest: NPO_Aaron
Today at 2:37 AM
Velocitor V Stinger
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Tailrace trout
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 9:16 PM
This is what its all about
Latest: CatDaddy
Yesterday at 8:07 PM
Merino Undies
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
What are you listening to these days?
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 3:27 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 2:02 PM
SOLD
Elec Power Washer
Latest: Zogman
Yesterday at 1:26 PM
T
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Twitch
Yesterday at 12:18 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 8:53 AM
No Mow May
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 6:24 AM
Tammy Miller
Latest: Trip McNeely
Thursday at 11:23 PM
Wild Turkey
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 9:26 PM
Sale
Marlin 30TK
Latest: Zogman
Thursday at 3:35 PM
Best facebook page ever .
Latest: Davey Crockett
Thursday at 12:45 PM
Skinwalker Ranch
Latest: BrokenBackJack
Thursday at 11:28 AM
T
Wicked Waters Taxidermy
Latest: Traxion
Thursday at 11:19 AM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: svnmag
Wednesday at 9:07 PM
R
Sak
Sak - New Town Area 5/4
Latest: Retired 2
Wednesday at 8:31 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
"Excess" Corp lands above 1620 in Emmons and Morton Counties to Private Owners
Top
Bottom