Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="guywhofishes" data-source="post: 238435" data-attributes="member: 337">I don't see a lot of 'armor' on the true frontal shot. None in fact, outside of those spindliest of ribs and cartilage. Why is a FOC arrow needed there???If you miss off to the side on a true frontal you'll gimp the shoulder - but at that point I'm not sure the trajectory would have passed through vitals anyway on a true frontal? Now quarterign toward on the other hand - that shoulder joint knuckle gives me trouble believing in it (see pic above). Which is why I asked about it earlier when it was mentioned but haven't read anything convincing that it's a good shot. That's a shot where it seems like a FOC/heavy arrow WOULD pay dividends (to reach vitals after striking bone).I'm no expert in the matter but the physics seem pretty convincing that a decently placed true frontal is deadly with standard archery equipment. bckhntr - what say you?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="guywhofishes, post: 238435, member: 337"] I don't see a lot of 'armor' on the true frontal shot. None in fact, outside of those spindliest of ribs and cartilage. Why is a FOC arrow needed there??? If you miss off to the side on a true frontal you'll gimp the shoulder - but at that point I'm not sure the trajectory would have passed through vitals anyway on a true frontal? Now quarterign toward on the other hand - that shoulder joint knuckle gives me trouble believing in it (see pic above). Which is why I asked about it earlier when it was mentioned but haven't read anything convincing that it's a good shot. That's a shot where it seems like a FOC/heavy arrow WOULD pay dividends (to reach vitals after striking bone). I'm no expert in the matter but the physics seem pretty convincing that a decently placed true frontal is deadly with standard archery equipment. bckhntr - what say you? [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA