Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="svnmag" data-source="post: 372543" data-attributes="member: 330">Finding doesn't necessarily mean catching although it's mighty helpful if you follow the 90/10 rule.&nbsp; I read an article back in the day which purported fish could detect sonar with their lateral lines.&nbsp; In GA we used to tool about to find fish and later come back sans electronics to fish an area marked with a discreet marker buoy. Our &quot;electronics&quot; was a portable &quot;Fishing Buddy&quot; screwed to the appropriate side of &quot;The Friendly Bitch&quot;:&nbsp; The dorkiest Yankee boat ever to grace Southern waters.&nbsp; She was fiberglass.&nbsp; She floated.The Scientific Method was never applied,&nbsp; We DID catch LM regularly using this &quot;method&quot; by marking shoreline irregularities for quick reference.&nbsp; &nbsp; I can't speak accurately about effectiveness of concept.The lateral line and olfactory capability is not given enough consideration IMO.That is all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="svnmag, post: 372543, member: 330"] Finding doesn't necessarily mean catching although it's mighty helpful if you follow the 90/10 rule. I read an article back in the day which purported fish could detect sonar with their lateral lines. In GA we used to tool about to find fish and later come back sans electronics to fish an area marked with a discreet marker buoy. Our "electronics" was a portable "Fishing Buddy" screwed to the appropriate side of "The Friendly Bitch": The dorkiest Yankee boat ever to grace Southern waters. She was fiberglass. She floated. The Scientific Method was never applied, We DID catch LM regularly using this "method" by marking shoreline irregularities for quick reference. I can't speak accurately about effectiveness of concept. The lateral line and olfactory capability is not given enough consideration IMO. That is all. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA