Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KDM" data-source="post: 443494" data-attributes="member: 314"><p>Oh I got it alright.&nbsp; You're bitching right now, but only you seems to not get it.&nbsp; The CRP program must give you hemorrhoids.&nbsp; All those tax dollars going to private landowners and all that habitat that produced all those booming populations of deer, pheasants, and other game that directly benefited the public.&nbsp; Often mentioned on this site as &quot;The Glory Days&quot;.&nbsp; Even though most of it was posted.&nbsp; Oh the horror.&nbsp; The thing is, that the vast majority of private landowners are NOT going to let the general public tromp on their land.&nbsp; A select few, yes, but not an open free for all.&nbsp; I already illustrated how using public funds for habitat on private land would directly benefit the public (as also proven by crp), but I guess that's unimportant to this exchange.&nbsp; Instead of looking at the possibilities, it's much more important to accuse me of getting a check. SMH.&nbsp; Buddy, I let a bunch of people hunt my land every year, both youth and adults.&nbsp; Many here on NDA have done so and more NDA'ers will in the future I'm sure.&nbsp; So if anyone should &quot;get a check&quot; for improving habitat and hunting access, it would be me.&nbsp; However, I don't.&nbsp; I use my own money.&nbsp; It's more satisfying that way to me.&nbsp; So enjoy your porcelain throneroom, pants on ankles hunting experience.&nbsp; I'm sure it's a real gas.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="KDM, post: 443494, member: 314"] Oh I got it alright. You're bitching right now, but only you seems to not get it. The CRP program must give you hemorrhoids. All those tax dollars going to private landowners and all that habitat that produced all those booming populations of deer, pheasants, and other game that directly benefited the public. Often mentioned on this site as "The Glory Days". Even though most of it was posted. Oh the horror. The thing is, that the vast majority of private landowners are NOT going to let the general public tromp on their land. A select few, yes, but not an open free for all. I already illustrated how using public funds for habitat on private land would directly benefit the public (as also proven by crp), but I guess that's unimportant to this exchange. Instead of looking at the possibilities, it's much more important to accuse me of getting a check. SMH. Buddy, I let a bunch of people hunt my land every year, both youth and adults. Many here on NDA have done so and more NDA'ers will in the future I'm sure. So if anyone should "get a check" for improving habitat and hunting access, it would be me. However, I don't. I use my own money. It's more satisfying that way to me. So enjoy your porcelain throneroom, pants on ankles hunting experience. I'm sure it's a real gas. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA