Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="deleted user" data-source="post: 363927" data-attributes="member: 1778">Covid wise I’m right there with you. This bill however, is not so simple. The G&F’s responsibility is managing the game populations. Their research whether you believe it or not is what led them to taking a proactive approach to control CWD in the one way they have the authority to regulate. They didn’t ban it across the state, they didn’t say you can’t hunt food plots, they didn’t say you can’t feed deer outside of actively hunting. A pretty good compromise really, didn’t take too much away from hunters and still covered their own legal bases. I’ve said it before that I have no qualms with baiting. I’ll probably do it if this bill goes through. It’s the precedent the bill establishes. Now, a vocal minority/majority or outside interests can establish game laws. Read the NDFB bylaws when you get a chance. They more or less want the G&F abolished. They want the same deal other western states are getting where big farmers are the ones allocated tags. This was the first step, and they did a good job getting people fired up enough to do their legwork for them. I hope they kept track of everyone who sent emails in favor, maybe you guys will be on Daryl’s list for a tag in 10 years.And before Fritz jumps in with how cynical I’m being, I saw the script NDFB handed to you guys for the first testimony, stating who was to speak, the topic, and for how long.</blockquote>

Verification: What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA