What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 366253" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>Did a little (or lot) of studying on Saskatchewan during this whole thing writing my testimony.. </p><p></p><p>Across the province mule deer pops are steady to increasing, white tail are increasing and they have a total prevalence of 20 something percent.. the south western portion of sask where there is upper 80s% in prevalence (they claim + or -9%) have had a slight decline in population, and there has been an increase in tags there as a management plan to try and reduce the population. Hunter success from 2020 to 2021 also drastically increased due in large part to Canadas strict covid policy's they are claiming. </p><p></p><p>Then everyone wants to claim Colorado and Wyoming as examples of what they want us to do (baiting restrictions in place). Wyoming still has a prevalence rate in the low 20%s if I remember right as a whole with multiple units pushing 50% prevalence and one bumping 70%. </p><p></p><p>"Slow the spread" and be reactive instead of proactive.. the name of the game for the G&F.. universities are working with the private sector to attempt to be proactive and find something that could help whether it be genetic resistance (Charlie B tip toes around this in his testimony) and things like copper and humic acid to help (whether they work or not is being studied but it's just thrown out the window without data either way by the game and fish).. peer reviewed studies take time with most of these being picked up the last few years so data isn't out, but instead of the game and fish being involved and being proactive with something besides checking another unit off with baiting restrictions, they could use some of that federal money they received (Jeb W skirts his sway around this in his testimony) to put into actually studying this disease and trying to find something that might work instead of doing head counts (has dropped from 15% to 4.2% involvement since 2019), increasing baiting restrictions, and putting decals on their pickups.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 366253, member: 8117"] Did a little (or lot) of studying on Saskatchewan during this whole thing writing my testimony.. Across the province mule deer pops are steady to increasing, white tail are increasing and they have a total prevalence of 20 something percent.. the south western portion of sask where there is upper 80s% in prevalence (they claim + or -9%) have had a slight decline in population, and there has been an increase in tags there as a management plan to try and reduce the population. Hunter success from 2020 to 2021 also drastically increased due in large part to Canadas strict covid policy's they are claiming. Then everyone wants to claim Colorado and Wyoming as examples of what they want us to do (baiting restrictions in place). Wyoming still has a prevalence rate in the low 20%s if I remember right as a whole with multiple units pushing 50% prevalence and one bumping 70%. "Slow the spread" and be reactive instead of proactive.. the name of the game for the G&F.. universities are working with the private sector to attempt to be proactive and find something that could help whether it be genetic resistance (Charlie B tip toes around this in his testimony) and things like copper and humic acid to help (whether they work or not is being studied but it's just thrown out the window without data either way by the game and fish).. peer reviewed studies take time with most of these being picked up the last few years so data isn't out, but instead of the game and fish being involved and being proactive with something besides checking another unit off with baiting restrictions, they could use some of that federal money they received (Jeb W skirts his sway around this in his testimony) to put into actually studying this disease and trying to find something that might work instead of doing head counts (has dropped from 15% to 4.2% involvement since 2019), increasing baiting restrictions, and putting decals on their pickups. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Melatonin
Latest: Davey Crockett
5 minutes ago
DEA is looking to drop marijuana down to a schedule 2 or 3 drug
Latest: Davey Crockett
20 minutes ago
Kristi Noem Dog Killer
Latest: Davey Crockett
50 minutes ago
Riddle Me This.....
Latest: CatDaddy
Today at 1:33 AM
Bismarck roads and driving
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
F
Bis to lose boat ramp
Latest: Fester
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Electric Vehicles
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 9:33 PM
Answer me this
Latest: svnmag
Yesterday at 8:18 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: lunkerslayer
Yesterday at 7:23 PM
Bank runs
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 7:12 PM
Spring
Latest: grumster
Yesterday at 3:11 PM
What boat ramp open in Bismark
Latest: Sluggo
Yesterday at 10:38 AM
Rain
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 2:09 AM
You paddledoggers are quiet...
Latest: cooter00
Thursday at 5:26 PM
Ruele Lake Boat Ramp
Latest: Shockwave
Thursday at 1:34 PM
zero turn recommendations
Latest: wslayer
Thursday at 12:52 PM
Heads up
Latest: johnr
Thursday at 9:39 AM
S
Minn Kota Ulterra DSC Lb $2500
Latest: Skeeter82
Thursday at 9:31 AM
4
tanglefree solo blind
Latest: 4Buck
Thursday at 8:14 AM
Quiet Pellet Gun
Latest: Allen
Thursday at 2:12 AM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom