What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wct12" data-source="post: 366253" data-attributes="member: 8117"><p>Did a little (or lot) of studying on Saskatchewan during this whole thing writing my testimony.. </p><p></p><p>Across the province mule deer pops are steady to increasing, white tail are increasing and they have a total prevalence of 20 something percent.. the south western portion of sask where there is upper 80s% in prevalence (they claim + or -9%) have had a slight decline in population, and there has been an increase in tags there as a management plan to try and reduce the population. Hunter success from 2020 to 2021 also drastically increased due in large part to Canadas strict covid policy's they are claiming. </p><p></p><p>Then everyone wants to claim Colorado and Wyoming as examples of what they want us to do (baiting restrictions in place). Wyoming still has a prevalence rate in the low 20%s if I remember right as a whole with multiple units pushing 50% prevalence and one bumping 70%. </p><p></p><p>"Slow the spread" and be reactive instead of proactive.. the name of the game for the G&F.. universities are working with the private sector to attempt to be proactive and find something that could help whether it be genetic resistance (Charlie B tip toes around this in his testimony) and things like copper and humic acid to help (whether they work or not is being studied but it's just thrown out the window without data either way by the game and fish).. peer reviewed studies take time with most of these being picked up the last few years so data isn't out, but instead of the game and fish being involved and being proactive with something besides checking another unit off with baiting restrictions, they could use some of that federal money they received (Jeb W skirts his sway around this in his testimony) to put into actually studying this disease and trying to find something that might work instead of doing head counts (has dropped from 15% to 4.2% involvement since 2019), increasing baiting restrictions, and putting decals on their pickups.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wct12, post: 366253, member: 8117"] Did a little (or lot) of studying on Saskatchewan during this whole thing writing my testimony.. Across the province mule deer pops are steady to increasing, white tail are increasing and they have a total prevalence of 20 something percent.. the south western portion of sask where there is upper 80s% in prevalence (they claim + or -9%) have had a slight decline in population, and there has been an increase in tags there as a management plan to try and reduce the population. Hunter success from 2020 to 2021 also drastically increased due in large part to Canadas strict covid policy's they are claiming. Then everyone wants to claim Colorado and Wyoming as examples of what they want us to do (baiting restrictions in place). Wyoming still has a prevalence rate in the low 20%s if I remember right as a whole with multiple units pushing 50% prevalence and one bumping 70%. "Slow the spread" and be reactive instead of proactive.. the name of the game for the G&F.. universities are working with the private sector to attempt to be proactive and find something that could help whether it be genetic resistance (Charlie B tip toes around this in his testimony) and things like copper and humic acid to help (whether they work or not is being studied but it's just thrown out the window without data either way by the game and fish).. peer reviewed studies take time with most of these being picked up the last few years so data isn't out, but instead of the game and fish being involved and being proactive with something besides checking another unit off with baiting restrictions, they could use some of that federal money they received (Jeb W skirts his sway around this in his testimony) to put into actually studying this disease and trying to find something that might work instead of doing head counts (has dropped from 15% to 4.2% involvement since 2019), increasing baiting restrictions, and putting decals on their pickups. [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
Beef prices going up????
Latest: Jiffy
3 minutes ago
Dickinson Sporting Complex
Latest: 1lessdog
6 minutes ago
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: SupressYourself
17 minutes ago
Montana to cut deer tags
Latest: Jiffy
21 minutes ago
Health insurance
Latest: Rowdie
Today at 12:50 PM
Late night treat!
Latest: Davy Crockett
Today at 11:48 AM
2016 Ice Castle 8x21 RV
Latest: JMF
Today at 10:52 AM
M
Food porn
Latest: measure-it
Today at 9:53 AM
Accuphy Ping Live Sonar
Latest: Shockwave
Today at 9:51 AM
Yard wide slip'n'slide
Latest: NDSportsman
Today at 9:46 AM
Weather 6/20/25
Latest: Zogman
Today at 7:21 AM
Flip-Over Shack & Diesel Heater
Latest: Whisky
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Yesterday at 7:16 PM
Any ice reports?
Latest: Rowdie
Yesterday at 12:58 PM
Property Tax Credit
Latest: johnr
Yesterday at 9:49 AM
S
BISON
Latest: savage270
Yesterday at 8:34 AM
Yoga
Latest: Davy Crockett
Monday at 11:34 PM
R
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Ruttin
Monday at 6:59 PM
What happened to "htat was me"
Latest: Rut2much
Monday at 3:51 PM
N
Squirrel trapping?
Latest: NDbowman
Monday at 3:28 PM
Seekins rifles
Latest: luvcatchingbass
Monday at 12:43 PM
Can stevie see?
Latest: lunkerslayer
Sunday at 9:58 PM
R
wrong place
Latest: riverview
Sunday at 8:33 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
House Bill 1151- Prohibiting baiting bans
Top
Bottom