Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gst" data-source="post: 164699" data-attributes="member: 373">kurt did the &quot;natives&quot; hold a deed as recognized under our Constitution of land ownership? It is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison. Part of this bill as I understand it is to end the &quot;discrimination&quot; of giving the land to the tribes but requiring others to purchase it. Can anyone show if recreation was in the agreement that the &quot;takings&quot; of these lands was originally proposed for? One should be able to take a step back and see the potential issue with a govt that can &quot;take&quot; lands citing one reason or need, then after the fact add other reasons or needs to keep what has been deemed taken in &quot;excess&quot;. We can not start to pick and choose and chip away at what parts of our Constitution we want to follow, the liberal already is trying to lead this nation down that path. </blockquote>

[QUOTE="gst, post: 164699, member: 373"] kurt did the "natives" hold a deed as recognized under our Constitution of land ownership? It is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison. Part of this bill as I understand it is to end the "discrimination" of giving the land to the tribes but requiring others to purchase it. Can anyone show if recreation was in the agreement that the "takings" of these lands was originally proposed for? One should be able to take a step back and see the potential issue with a govt that can "take" lands citing one reason or need, then after the fact add other reasons or needs to keep what has been deemed taken in "excess". [COLOR=#333333]We can not start to pick and choose and chip away at what parts of our Constitution we want to follow, the liberal already is trying to lead this nation down that path. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA