What's new
Forums
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Pics
Videos
Fishing Reports
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Members
Resources
Whopper Club
Politics
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General
General Discussion
Interesting fish situation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JayKay" data-source="post: 52008" data-attributes="member: 324"><p>I was not around prior to Garrison Dam being built, but not only do I enjoy having the lights come on when I flip the switch - I also enjoy my home in south Bismarck, which would be highly impossible if not for the dam. </p><p></p><p>Not to say, we have (I'm using loose numbers here) 9 bajillion fish to stock anyhow. Could it be cheaper to remove, for instance, Garrison Dam (can't imagine what that alone would cost) and then have yearly floods (can't imagine what that would cost) versus just stock the darned fish above and below the dam?</p><p></p><p>I realize that we're not necessarily talking about Garrison Dam, but talking about the tree-huggers and other various "crunchy" people being against anything man-made put into the wilderness.</p><p></p><p>I know I'm preaching to the choir here. I kinda actually think, for once, that I'm agreeing with Dean. </p><p></p><p>And yes, SDMF, you nailed it, when you say "survival of the fittest".</p><p></p><p>My 2 cents...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JayKay, post: 52008, member: 324"] I was not around prior to Garrison Dam being built, but not only do I enjoy having the lights come on when I flip the switch - I also enjoy my home in south Bismarck, which would be highly impossible if not for the dam. Not to say, we have (I'm using loose numbers here) 9 bajillion fish to stock anyhow. Could it be cheaper to remove, for instance, Garrison Dam (can't imagine what that alone would cost) and then have yearly floods (can't imagine what that would cost) versus just stock the darned fish above and below the dam? I realize that we're not necessarily talking about Garrison Dam, but talking about the tree-huggers and other various "crunchy" people being against anything man-made put into the wilderness. I know I'm preaching to the choir here. I kinda actually think, for once, that I'm agreeing with Dean. And yes, SDMF, you nailed it, when you say "survival of the fittest". My 2 cents... [/QUOTE]
Verification
What is the most common fish caught on this site?
Post reply
Recent Posts
A.I. Are you Excited?
Latest: Davy Crockett
23 minutes ago
NDSU to the FBS???
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
33 minutes ago
Heated jackets
Latest: Zogman
Today at 11:36 AM
Buying gold and silver.
Latest: Maddog
Today at 8:54 AM
H
The Decline of Devils Lake
Latest: huntemup
Today at 7:49 AM
N
Sale
2022 Can-Am Defender
Latest: NDwirehair
Yesterday at 7:22 PM
Hobby
Latest: 3Roosters
Yesterday at 4:26 PM
Wood Stoves
Latest: FishFinder97
Yesterday at 3:25 PM
I HATE coyotes!!!!
Latest: wslayer
Yesterday at 2:01 PM
Health Care Cost
Latest: Obi-Wan
Yesterday at 10:12 AM
Western ND river ice
Latest: Jiffy
Yesterday at 8:00 AM
Marijuana News Tidbits
Latest: 1bigfokker
Yesterday at 12:12 AM
Concealed carry
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 10:40 PM
Customer service
Latest: jr2280
Friday at 10:17 PM
Catfish anyone?
Latest: svnmag
Friday at 8:15 PM
Generation X
Latest: wslayer
Friday at 5:04 PM
NFL News (Vikings)
Latest: Eatsleeptrap
Friday at 4:47 PM
500,000 acre habitat program
Latest: Obi-Wan
Friday at 9:30 AM
A
Bitcoin
Latest: Auggie
Friday at 6:25 AM
CCI Uppercut JHP ammo?
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 10:31 PM
Model 12 Winchester
Latest: svnmag
Thursday at 8:29 PM
Outdoor photo request
Latest: Maddog
Thursday at 5:42 PM
ICE Fishing videos
Latest: tikkalover
Thursday at 3:24 PM
Friends of NDA
Forums
General
General Discussion
Interesting fish situation
Top
Bottom