Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SDMF" data-source="post: 292503" data-attributes="member: 412">I haven't looked for diddly.&nbsp; I haven't a clue what studies are out there or what size they are regarding CBD, MJ, Medicinal, or Recreational.What I DO have is a lifetime growing up around medicine and clinical studies.&nbsp; Reading studies, dissecting them, assessing veracity, and presenting them.&nbsp; Numbers below N=500 are acceptable for drugs, compounds, or therapies seeking to treat maladies experienced by a specific and small group of folks.&nbsp; However, if one was seeking to make an actual claim regarding something like efficacy against chronic pain, or arthritic inflammatory pain, one would need an N=1500 or more and be double-blinded, randomized, multi-center, placebo controlled to be taken seriously.I'm not saying CBD does or doesn't work.&nbsp; Apparently according to &quot;mikemcgfnd&quot; it's &quot;Life or Death&quot; for some people.&nbsp; If it's that effective and important all I'd ask is to &quot;Prove It&quot; in a Double-Blind, Randomized, Pacebo-Controlled, Multi-Clinical Center study.&nbsp; For an N=300 I could write a study stating:&nbsp; &quot;CBD + H2O ameliorates the effects of over-alcoholization within 12hours&quot; on just one reasonably sized college campus dormitory compound over no more than 2-3 weekends.Without strong and repeatable data CBD is always going to be seen as snake oil/get-rich quick scheme grown by 30-somethings in their parent's basement.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SDMF, post: 292503, member: 412"] I haven't looked for diddly. I haven't a clue what studies are out there or what size they are regarding CBD, MJ, Medicinal, or Recreational. What I DO have is a lifetime growing up around medicine and clinical studies. Reading studies, dissecting them, assessing veracity, and presenting them. Numbers below N=500 are acceptable for drugs, compounds, or therapies seeking to treat maladies experienced by a specific and small group of folks. However, if one was seeking to make an actual claim regarding something like efficacy against chronic pain, or arthritic inflammatory pain, one would need an N=1500 or more and be double-blinded, randomized, multi-center, placebo controlled to be taken seriously. I'm not saying CBD does or doesn't work. Apparently according to "mikemcgfnd" it's "Life or Death" for some people. If it's that effective and important all I'd ask is to "Prove It" in a Double-Blind, Randomized, Pacebo-Controlled, Multi-Clinical Center study. For an N=300 I could write a study stating: "CBD + H2O ameliorates the effects of over-alcoholization within 12hours" on just one reasonably sized college campus dormitory compound over no more than 2-3 weekends. Without strong and repeatable data CBD is always going to be seen as snake oil/get-rich quick scheme grown by 30-somethings in their parent's basement. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What is the most common fish caught on this site?

Reply to thread

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA